Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSeidler, Anna Lene
dc.contributor.authorHunter, Kylie E
dc.contributor.authorCheyne, Saskia
dc.contributor.authorGhersi, Davina
dc.contributor.authorBerlin, Jesse A
dc.contributor.authorAskie, Lisa
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-23T05:35:12Z
dc.date.available2021-03-23T05:35:12Z
dc.date.issued2020en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24715
dc.description.abstractIn a prospective meta-analysis (PMA), study selection criteria, hypotheses, and analyses are specified before the results of the studies related to the PMA research question are known, reducing many of the problems associated with a traditional (retrospective) meta-analysis. PMAs have many advantages: they can help reduce research waste and bias, and they are adaptive, efficient, and collaborative. Despite an increase in the number of health research articles labelled as PMAs, the methodology remains rare, novel, and often misunderstood. This paper provides detailed guidance on how to address the key elements for conducting a high quality PMA with a case study to illustrate each step.en_AU
dc.publisherBritish Medical Journalen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.titleA guide to prospective meta-analysisen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmj.l5342
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::NHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.