Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Rui
dc.contributor.authorSeidler, Anna Lene
dc.contributor.authorAskie, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorNorman, Robert J
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharya, Siladitya
dc.contributor.authorvan Wely, Madelon
dc.contributor.authorMol, Ben Willem
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-23T03:40:22Z
dc.date.available2021-03-23T03:40:22Z
dc.date.issued2020en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24707
dc.description.abstractAbstract Network meta-analysis allows researchers to synthesise both direct and indirect evidence, thus enabling simultaneous comparisons of multiple treatments. A relatively recent addition to evidence synthesis in reproductive medicine, this approach has become increasingly popular. Yet, the underlying assumptions of network meta-analyses, which drive the validity of their findings, have been frequently ignored. In this article, we discuss the strengths and limitations of network meta-analyses. In addition, we present an overview of published network meta-analyses in reproductive medicine, summarize their challenges and provide insights into future research opportunities.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherHuman Reproductionsen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.titleNetwork meta-analyses in reproductive medicine: challenges and opportunitiesen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/humrep/deaa126
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::NHMRC Clinical Trials Centreen_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.