Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlafaci, Christian
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-18T02:33:48Z
dc.date.available2021-03-18T02:33:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-18
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/24675
dc.description.abstractWhile classical accounts of identity (‘classical’ here pertaining to both logics and physics) are generally well understood, the advent of quantum theory, specifically quantum statistics, has cast shadow over these conceptions. Dealing with the consequently surfacing problems is a philosophically rich and interesting enterprise. I begin this thesis by providing an exegesis of the roles played by, and features of, identity in logics, classical physics, and quantum physics. Therein I consider how under a quantal description of reality, classical notions of identity and individuality break down. In the second chapter, I address how this problem has launched an arc of thought in analytic metaphysics and formal philosophy motivating the development of non-standard formal frameworks with which philosophical sense can be made of quantal objects. Among these, I explore and critically evaluate quaset theory, quasi-set theory, and non-reflexive Schr¨odinger logics, identifying some significant problems with quaset theory that arise in defining cardinality and later, pointing out a problem with Schr¨odinger logics in their modelling of the continuity between quantal and classical treatments of the world. The queer character of identity in the quantal regime motivates a turn to vagueness which I introduce in the third chapter, providing a brief outline of vagueness and the sorites paradox. Further, I reflect on the fundamental nature of vagueness, outlining and evaluating the semantic and ontic conceptions thereof. In the final chapter, I proceed to explicate and assess notions that identity and quantal objects can be vague. I shall discuss accounts according to which the vagueness of identity and quantum objects is posited as a feature of nature emerging in quantum systems — the ontic vagueness of identity — finding that these ideas are flawed and/or rely on misinterpretations of vagueness. Finally, I present an argument which suggests how the vagueness of identity can arise as an artifact of the differing treatments of identity in the quantal and classical regimes in which the vagueness involved can be semantic rather than ontic.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectphilosophyen_AU
dc.subjectphysicsen_AU
dc.subjectvaguenessen_AU
dc.subjectidentityen_AU
dc.subjectquantumen_AU
dc.subjectlogicen_AU
dc.subjectlogicsen_AU
dc.subjectmetaphysicsen_AU
dc.subjectindeterminacyen_AU
dc.subjectwittgensteinen_AU
dc.subjectlanguageen_AU
dc.titleVagueness, Identity, and Quantum Objectsen_AU
dc.typeThesisen_AU
dc.type.thesisHonoursen_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences::School of Philosophical and Historical Inquiryen_AU
usyd.departmentDepartment of Philosophyen_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.