Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMueller, M
dc.contributor.authorZolfaghari, R
dc.contributor.authorBriggs, A
dc.contributor.authorFurtado, H
dc.contributor.authorBooth, J
dc.contributor.authorKeall, P
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, D
dc.contributor.authorO'Brien, R
dc.contributor.authorShieh, CC
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-05
dc.date.available2020-11-06
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/23737
dc.description.abstractThe ability to track tumour motion without implanted markers on a standard linear accelerator (linac) could enable wide access to real-time adaptive radiotherapy for cancer patients. We previously have retrospectively validated a method for 3D markerless target tracking using intra-fractional kilovoltage (kV) projections acquired on a standard linac. This paper presents the first prospective implementation of markerless lung target tracking on a standard linac and its quality assurance (QA) procedure. The workflow and the algorithm developed to track the 3D target position during volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment delivery were optimised. The linac was operated in clinical QA mode, while kV projections were streamed to a dedicated computer using a frame-grabber software. The markerless target tracking accuracy and precision were measured in a lung phantom experiment under the following conditions: static localisation of seven distinct positions, dynamic localisation of five patient-measured motion traces, and dynamic localisation with treatment interruption. The QA guidelines were developed following the AAPM Task Group 147 report with the requirement that the tracking margin components, the margins required to account for tracking errors, did not exceed 5 mm in any direction. The mean tracking error ranged from 0.0 to 0.9 mm (left-right), -0.6 to -0.1 mm (superior-inferior) and -0.7 to 0.1 mm (anterior-posterior) over the three tests. Larger errors were found in cases with large left-right or anterior-posterior and small superior-inferior motion. The tracking margin components did not exceed 5 mm in any direction and ranged from 0.4 to 3.2 mm (left-right), 0.7 to 1.6 mm (superior-inferior) and 0.8 to 1.5 mm (anterior-posterior). This study presents the first prospective implementation of markerless lung target tracking on a standard linac and provides a QA procedure for its safe clinical implementation, potentially enabling real-time adaptive radiotherapy for a large population of lung cancer patients.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherIOPscienceen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofPhysics in Medicine & Biologyen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectmotion managementen_AU
dc.titleThe first prospective implementation of markerless lung target tracking in an experimental quality assurance procedure on a standard linear accelerator.en_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrc02 Physical Sciencesen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1088/1361-6560/ab5d8b
dc.rights.otherThis is an author-created, un-copyedited version of an article accepted for publication/published in 'Physics in Medicine & Biology'. IOP Publishing Ltd is not responsible for any errors or omissions in this version of the manuscript or any version deriveden_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Sydney School of Health Sciencesen_AU
usyd.citation.volume65en_AU
usyd.citation.issue2en_AU
usyd.citation.spage1en_AU
usyd.citation.epage12en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.