Neuroscience in gambling policy and treatment: an interdisciplinary perspective
Access status:
Open Access
Type
ArticleAuthor/s
Yücel, MuratCarter, Adrian
Allen, Amy R.
Balleine, Bernard
Clark, Luke
Dowling, Nicki A.
Gainsbury, Sally M.
Goudriaan, Anna E.
Grant, Jon
Hayes, Alan
Hodgins, David
van Holst, Ruth
Lattimore, Ralph
Livingstone, Charles
Lorenzetti, Valentina
Lubman, Dan
Murawski, Carsten
Parkes, Linden
Petry, Nancy
Room, Robin
Singh, Bruce
Thomas, Anna
Townshend, Phil
Youssef, George
Hall, Wayne
Abstract
Neuroscientific explanations of gambling disorder can help people make sense of their experiences and guide the development of psychosocial interventions. However, the societal perceptions and implications of these explanations are not always clear or helpful. Two workshops in 2013 ...
See moreNeuroscientific explanations of gambling disorder can help people make sense of their experiences and guide the development of psychosocial interventions. However, the societal perceptions and implications of these explanations are not always clear or helpful. Two workshops in 2013 and 2014 brought together multidisciplinary researchers aiming to improve the clinical and policy-related effects of neuroscience research on gambling. The workshops revealed that neuroscience can be used to improve identification of the dangers of products used in gambling. Additionally, there was optimism associated with the diagnostic and prognostic uses of neuroscience in problem gambling and the provision of novel tools (eg, virtual reality) to assess the effectiveness of new policy interventions before their implementation. Other messages from these workshops were that neuroscientific models of decision making could provide a strong rationale for precommitment strategies and that interdisciplinary collaborations are needed to reduce the harms of gambling.
See less
See moreNeuroscientific explanations of gambling disorder can help people make sense of their experiences and guide the development of psychosocial interventions. However, the societal perceptions and implications of these explanations are not always clear or helpful. Two workshops in 2013 and 2014 brought together multidisciplinary researchers aiming to improve the clinical and policy-related effects of neuroscience research on gambling. The workshops revealed that neuroscience can be used to improve identification of the dangers of products used in gambling. Additionally, there was optimism associated with the diagnostic and prognostic uses of neuroscience in problem gambling and the provision of novel tools (eg, virtual reality) to assess the effectiveness of new policy interventions before their implementation. Other messages from these workshops were that neuroscientific models of decision making could provide a strong rationale for precommitment strategies and that interdisciplinary collaborations are needed to reduce the harms of gambling.
See less
Date
2017-02-14Publisher
ElsevierLicence
OtherFaculty/School
Faculty of ScienceCitation
Yucel, M., Carter, A., Allen, A. R., Balleine, B., Clark, L., Dowling, N. A., Gainsbury, S. M., Goudriaan, A. E., Grant, J., Hayes, A., Hodgins, D., van Holst, R., Lattimore, R., Livingstone, C., Lorenzetti, V., Lubman, D., Murawski, C., Parkes, L., Petry, N., Room, R., Singh, B., Thomas, A., Townshend, P., Youssef, G., Hall, W. (2017). Neuroscience in gambling policy and treatment: an interdisciplinary perspective. The Lancet Psychiatry, 4(6), 501-506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30369-8Share