Hazards and disasters in the Anthropocene: some critical reflections for the future
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Dominey-Howes, Dale T.M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-14 | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-14 | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-12-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Dominey-Howes, D. (2018). Hazards and disasters in the Anthropocene: some critical reflections for the future. Geoscience Letters, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-018-0107-x | en_AU |
dc.identifier.issn | 21964092 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2123/20901 | |
dc.description.abstract | The arrival of the Anthropocene presents many challenges—both theoretical and practical. Scholars in different disciplines, practitioners, the public and others, are all considering the meaning of the Anthropocene and how its arrival affects their ways of knowing and doing. Given that a dominant narrative of the Anthropocene is one of a coming crisis, hazard, and disaster experts from different disciplines have much to contribute. Here, I briefly summarize the trajectory of hazards’ and disasters’ research through to the present to provide the context to ask a series of critical questions that experts in hazard and disaster might address to make theoretical and practical contributions to making the Anthropocene as good as it might be. The questions considered are: how useful is the contemporary crisis narrative of the Anthropocene for understanding the planetary history of hazards and disasters, and coupled to this; is the modern language of disaster risk reduction useful for understanding past disasters; how do we give voice to the more-than-human experiences of Anthropocene disasters; is it possible to mitigate the impacts of future hazards and disasters within the Anthropocene without addressing the root causes of vulnerability; how do we make space for slow emergencies and what do slow emergencies mean for understanding hazard and disaster in the Anthropocene; and finally, does the scholarship of hazard and disaster provide evidence useful for informing the debate about an early or late-start for the Anthropocene? © 2018, The Author(s). | en_AU |
dc.description.sponsorship | I thank Emma Calgaro for her insights and discussions on vulnerability and Siri Veland for critical analysis on the meaning of the Anthropocene for ‘others’. I am extremely grateful to Lauren Rickards and Matthew Kearnes for permission to work with material they have presented but not yet published on the con‑ cept of slow emergencies. I thank the Australian Research Council for funding that has supported the work underpinning this manuscript thinking via Grant DP130100877. The Editor and two anonymous referees are thanked for provid‑ ing feedback that greatly improved the manuscript. This work is gratefully supported by Australian Research Council Grant DP130100877. | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en_AU | en_AU |
dc.publisher | SpringerOpen | en_AU |
dc.relation | ARC-DP130100877,DP130100877,DP130100877,DP130100877 | en_AU |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2018. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. | en_AU |
dc.subject | Anthropocene | en_AU |
dc.subject | Critical questions | en_AU |
dc.subject | Disasters | en_AU |
dc.subject | Disciplinary contributions | en_AU |
dc.subject | Emergencies | en_AU |
dc.subject | Future | en_AU |
dc.subject | Hazards | en_AU |
dc.title | Hazards and disasters in the Anthropocene: some critical reflections for the future | en_AU |
dc.type | Article | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | 040604 | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | 040606 | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | 160403 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/s40562-018-0107-x | |
dc.type.pubtype | Publisher's version | en_AU |
Associated file/s
Associated collections