Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVeldre, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, Sally
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-14
dc.date.available2019-02-14
dc.date.issued2017-04-01
dc.identifier.citationVeldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2017). Parafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatedness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 519-528. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1120-8en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/19998
dc.description.abstractRecent evidence from studies using the gaze-contingent boundary paradigm suggests that parafoveal preview benefit is contingent on the fit between a preview word and the sentence context. We investigated whether this plausibility preview benefit is modulated by preview/target orthographic relatedness. Participants’ eye movements were recorded as they read sentences in which the parafoveal preview of a target word was manipulated. Non-identical previews were plausible or implausible continuations of the sentence that were either an orthographic neighbor of the target or unrelated to the target. First-pass reading measures showed a strong plausibility preview benefit. There was also a benefit from preview/target orthographic relatedness across reading measures. These two preview effects did not interact on any fixation measure. There was also no evidence that the relatedness effect was caused by misperception of an orthographically similar preview as the target word. These data highlight the existence of two independent mechanisms underlying preview effects: a benefit from the contextual fit of the preview word in the sentence and a benefit from the sublexical overlap between the preview and target word.en
dc.description.sponsorshipAustralian Research Councilen
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relationARC DP160103224en
dc.rightsOtheren
dc.subjectReadingen
dc.subjectEye movementsen
dc.titleParafoveal preview benefit in sentence reading: Independent effects of plausibility and orthographic relatednessen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrcFoR::170112 - Sensory Processes, Perception and Performanceen
dc.subject.asrcFoR::170204 - Linguistic Processes (incl. Speech Production and Comprehension)en
dc.identifier.doi10.3758/s13423-016-1120-8
dc.type.pubtypeAuthor accepted manuscripten
dc.relation.arcDP160103224
dc.rights.otherThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. The final authenticated version is available online at https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1120-8en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Scienceen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.