Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Chee Khoon
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, David
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, Emma
dc.contributor.authorJoensuu, Heikki
dc.contributor.authorZalcberg, John
dc.contributor.authorVerweij, Jaap
dc.contributor.authorCasali, Paolo G
dc.contributor.authorMaki, Robert G
dc.contributor.authorCioffi, Angela
dc.contributor.authorMcArthur, Grant
dc.contributor.authorLord, Sarah J
dc.contributor.authorYip, Desmond
dc.contributor.authorKanjanapan, Yada
dc.contributor.authorRutkowski, Piotr
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-28
dc.date.available2016-07-28
dc.date.issued2015-03-19
dc.identifier.citationLee CK, Goldstein D, Gibbs E, Joensuu H, Zalcberg J, Verweij J, Casali PG, Maki RG, Cioffi A, McArthur G, Lord SJ, Yip D, Kanjanapan Y, Rutkowski P. Development and validation of prognostic nomograms for metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour treated with imatinib. European Journal of Cancer 2015; 51(7): 852-860.en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/15407
dc.description.abstractPurpose Metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is generally an incurable disease with variable response to imatinib. We aimed to develop prognostic nomograms to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients treated with imatinib. Methods Nomograms were developed in a training cohort (n=330) of patients treated in a randomized trial (EORTC-ISG-AGITG 62005 phase III study) using Cox regression models, and validated in patients (n=236) treated in routine clinical care from six referral centers. Nomogram performance was assessed by calculating the c statistic. A classification based on the nomograms’ scores was generated to group patients according to risk. Results Nomogram risk factors for OS and PFS were size of the largest metastasis, tumor genotype, primary tumor mitotic count, hemoglobin, and blood neutrophil count at commencement of imatinib. The nomograms predicted survival with a c statistic of 0.75 (training) and 0.62 (validation) for OS, and 0.69 (training) and 0.62 (validation) for PFS. When tested in the validation cohort, the nomograms discriminated well the high and intermediate risk from low risk patients (hazard ratio [HR] for OS 3.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71–8.56; and 2.48, 95% CI 1.12–5.50; for PFS 2.84, 95% CI 1.66–4.87; and 1.45, 95% CI 0.87–2.41, respectively). Conclusion The nomograms predicted the risk of GIST progression and death with good discrimination of risk groups, and may be of value for patient counselling and risk stratification.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.subjectgastrointestinal stromal tumouren_AU
dc.subjectImatiniben_AU
dc.subjectnomogramen_AU
dc.subjectprognosisen_AU
dc.titleDevelopment and validation of prognostic nomograms for metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour treated with imatiniben_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.type.pubtypePost-printen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.