Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDegeling, C
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-26
dc.date.available2016-02-26
dc.date.issued2008-01-01
dc.identifier.citationDegeling C. (2008). Consanguinity, Canines and One-Medicine: All the Qualities of a Dog except Loyalty. Health and History, 10(2), 26-45. http://doi.org/10.2307/40111302en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/14431
dc.description.abstractThe rise of pet culture and the expansion of medical science occurred concurrently in the late–nineteenth century. From this time in Anglo-American societies dogs were simultaneously valorised as ‘man’s best friend’ and the ‘ideal model’ for experimental medicine. By tracking the hounds into our laboratories and onto the settee, changes in our conception of the properties of blood and canine breeding can be used to excavate covert connections between the contradictory social and scientific utilisations of this species. Describing the movement of genealogical and medical knowledge between the bench-top, the kennel and the clinic illustrates how Rudolph Virchow’s earlier promotion of a concept of ‘one-medicine’ foreshadowed the twentieth-century concomitant development and intermingling of the biomedical sciences and a sophisticated companion animal medical expertise.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherAustralian and New Zealand Society of the History of Medicineen_AU
dc.titleCanines, Consanguinity, and One-Medicine: All the Qualities of a Dog except Loyaltyen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.