Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Canines, Consanguinity, and One-Medicine: All the Qualities of a Dog except Loyalty|
|Authors: ||Degeling, C|
|Issue Date: ||2008|
|Publisher: ||Australian and New Zealand Society of the History of Medicine|
|Citation: ||Degeling C. (2008). Consanguinity, Canines and One-Medicine: All the Qualities of a Dog except Loyalty. Health and History, 10(2), 26-45. http://doi.org/10.2307/40111302|
|Abstract: ||The rise of pet culture and the expansion of medical science occurred concurrently in the late–nineteenth century. From this time in Anglo-American societies dogs were simultaneously valorised as ‘man’s best friend’ and the ‘ideal model’ for experimental medicine. By tracking the hounds into our laboratories and onto the settee, changes in our conception of the properties of blood and canine breeding can be used to excavate covert connections between the contradictory social and scientific utilisations of this species. Describing the movement of genealogical and medical knowledge between the bench-top, the kennel and the clinic illustrates how Rudolph Virchow’s earlier promotion of a concept of ‘one-medicine’ foreshadowed the twentieth-century concomitant development and intermingling of the biomedical sciences and a sophisticated companion animal medical expertise.|
|Type of Work: ||Article|
|Appears in Collections:||Research Papers and Publications. Sydney Health Ethics|
This work is protected by Copyright. All rights reserved. Access to this work is provided for the purposes of personal research and study. Except where permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, this work must not be copied or communicated to others without the express permission of the copyright owner. Use the persistent URI in this record to enable others to access this work.
|canines-consanguinity-PP-2008.pdf||674.09 kB||Adobe PDF|
Items in Sydney eScholarship Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.