Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCarter, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorZannino, Diana
dc.contributor.authorSimes, R John
dc.contributor.authorSchofield, Deborah J
dc.contributor.authorHoward, Kirsten
dc.contributor.authorZalcberg, John R
dc.contributor.authorPrice, Timothy J
dc.contributor.authorTebbutt, Niall C
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-14
dc.date.available2015-12-14
dc.date.issued2015-12-14
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/14140
dc.description.abstractBackground: Based on the clinical data, bevacizumab has been approved in Australia and globally for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. However, limited evidence exists for its cost-effectiveness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of adding bevacizumab to capecitabine monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, using data from the prospective economic evaluation conducted alongside the MAX trial. Methods: Individual patient level data on resource use and progression free survival were prospectively collected in the phase III MAX trial. Resource use data were collected for the period between randomisation and disease progression, and unit costs were assigned from the perspective of the Australian health care funder. Effectiveness was measured in quality adjusted progression free survival years, with utility scores obtained from both the community valued EQ-5D questionnaire and the patient valued UBQ-C questionnaire. Progression free survival was used as a secondary effectiveness measure. Results: The addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine monotherapy cost approximately $192,156 (95% confidence interval [CI], $135,619 to $326,894) per quality adjusted progression free survival year gained when using publicly listed pharmaceutical prices and utility values from the EQ-5D questionnaire. This decreased to $149,455 (95% CI, $100,356 to $245,910) when values from the UBQ-C questionnaire were applied. The incremental cost per progression free survival year was $145,059 (95% CI, $106,703 to $233,225). Conclusions: Bevacizumab was not found to be cost effective at its listed price, based on results from the MAX trial.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipRoche Products Pty Ltden_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.relationRoche, NHMRC program grant 1037786, Cancer Australia, Cancer Institute New South Walesen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright 2013 Elsevier Ltd.en_AU
dc.subjectcost-effectivenessen_AU
dc.subjectcolorectal canceren_AU
dc.subjecteconomic studyen_AU
dc.subjecthealth economicsen_AU
dc.subjectadvanced canceren_AU
dc.subjectbevacizumaben_AU
dc.subjectpharmaceutical costsen_AU
dc.titleThe cost effectiveness of bevacizumab when added to capecitabine, with or without mitomycin-C, in first line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Australasian phase III MAX studyen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.type.pubtypePost-printen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.