Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPrice, Timothy J
dc.contributor.authorHardingham, Jennifer E
dc.contributor.authorLee, Chee K
dc.contributor.authorTownsend, Amanda R
dc.contributor.authorWrin, Joseph W
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Kate
dc.contributor.authorWeickhardt, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorSimes, Robert J
dc.contributor.authorMurone, Carmel
dc.contributor.authorTebbutt, Niall C
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-01
dc.date.available2015-12-01
dc.date.issued2013-03-01
dc.identifier.citationPrice TJ, Hardingham JE, Lee CK, Townsend AR, Wrin JW, Wilson K, Weickhardt A, Simes RJ, Murone C, Tebbutt NC. Prognostic impact and the relevance of PTEN copy number alterations in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving bevacizumab. Cancer Medicine 2013; 2(3): 277–285.en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/14084
dc.description.abstractLoss of phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) expression may be prognostic in colorectal cancer (CRC) and may have a correlation with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression via hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) alpha, and the PI3K/mTOR pathways. We therefore have explored the prognostic association of PTEN loss and the potential that PTEN loss may be predictive of outcome with bevacizumab. Patients enrolled in the AGITG MAX trial, a randomized Phase III trial of capecitabine (C) +/ bevacizumab (B) (+/ mitomycin C [M]) with available tissues were analyzed for PTEN expression (loss vs. no loss) as assessed using a Taqman copy number assay (CNA). Of the original 471 patients enrolled, tissues from 302 (64.1%) patients were analyzed. PTEN loss was observed in 38.7% of patients. There was no relationship between PTEN loss and KRAS or BRAF mutation. PTEN status was not prognostic for progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in multivariate analyses adjusting for other baseline factors; loss versus no loss PFS hazard ratio (HR) 0.9 (0.7–1.16), OS HR 1.04 (0.79–1.38). PTEN was not prognostic when assessed by KRAS and BRAF status. By using the comparison of C versus CB+CBM, PTEN status was not significantly predictive of the effectiveness of B for PFS or OS. PTEN status was not prognostic for survival in advanced colorectal cancer, irrespective of KRAS or BRAF status. PTEN statusen_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipRoche Products Pty Ltd (Australia), Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Groupen_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherWileyen_AU
dc.relationNHMRC Program Grant 1037786, Cancer Australia, Cancer Institute NSWen_AU
dc.subjectbevacizumaben_AU
dc.subjectcolorectal canceren_AU
dc.subjectKRASen_AU
dc.subjectPTENen_AU
dc.subjectVEGFen_AU
dc.subjectbiomarkersen_AU
dc.subjectprognosisen_AU
dc.titlePrognostic impact and the relevance of PTEN copy number alterations in patients with advanced colorectal cancer receiving bevacizumaben_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.