Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMayes, C
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-08
dc.date.available2014-09-08
dc.date.issued2014-06-27
dc.identifier.citationChristopher Mayes Because we can, does it mean we should? The ethics of GM food The Conversationen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2123/11804
dc.description.abstractFood is cultural, social and deeply personal, so it’s no surprise that modifications to the way food is produced, distributed and consumed often lead to ethical debates. Developments in the genetic modification (GM) of foods and crops has resulted in a raft of controversies. Ethics can help here. While science determines whether we can safely modify the genetic makeup of certain organisms, ethics asks whether we should. Ethics tries to move beyond factual statements about what is, to evaluative statements about the way we should act towards ourselves, each other and the environment we inhabit. But things are not always so clear-cut. Three areas of ethics can help frame some of the concerns with GM food and crops: virtue, moral status and consequences.en
dc.language.isoen_AUen
dc.publisherThe Conversationen
dc.rightsOther
dc.titleBecause we can, does it mean we should? The ethics of GM foodsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.pubtypeAuthor accepted manuscripten
usyd.facultyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Health Ethics


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.