Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||Because we can, does it mean we should? The ethics of GM foods|
|Authors: ||Mayes, C|
|Issue Date: ||27-Jun-2014|
|Publisher: ||The Conversation|
|Citation: ||Christopher Mayes Because we can, does it mean we should? The ethics of GM food The Conversation|
|Abstract: ||Food is cultural, social and deeply personal, so it’s no surprise that modifications to the way food is produced, distributed and consumed often lead to ethical debates.
Developments in the genetic modification (GM) of foods and crops has resulted in a raft of controversies.
Ethics can help here. While science determines whether we can safely modify the genetic makeup of certain organisms, ethics asks whether we should.
Ethics tries to move beyond factual statements about what is, to evaluative statements about the way we should act towards ourselves, each other and the environment we inhabit. But things are not always so clear-cut.
Three areas of ethics can help frame some of the concerns with GM food and crops: virtue, moral status and consequences.|
|Rights and Permissions: ||CC BY-NC 3.0, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/|
|Type of Work: ||Article|
|Type of Publication: ||Post-print|
|Appears in Collections:||Research Papers and Publications. Sydney Health Ethics|
This work is protected by Copyright. All rights reserved. Access to this work is provided for the purposes of personal research and study. Except where permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, this work must not be copied or communicated to others without the express permission of the copyright owner. Use the persistent URI in this record to enable others to access this work.
|TheConv-because-we-can-2014.pdf||248.95 kB||Adobe PDF|
Items in Sydney eScholarship Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.