Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGow, Megan
dc.contributor.authorJebeile, Hiba
dc.contributor.authorHouse, Eve T
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, Shirley
dc.contributor.authorBaur, Louise A
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Justin
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Claire E
dc.contributor.authorCowell, Chris T
dc.contributor.authorDay, Kaitlin
dc.contributor.authorGarnett, Sarah P
dc.contributor.authorGrunseit, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorInkster, Mary-Kate
dc.contributor.authorKwok, Cathy
dc.contributor.authorLang, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorPaxton, Susan J
dc.contributor.authorTruby, Helen
dc.contributor.authorVarady, Krista A
dc.contributor.authorLister, Natalie B
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-03T00:14:47Z
dc.date.available2026-07-03T00:14:47Z
dc.date.issued2024en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/35527
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to determine the efficacy, safety and acceptability of a 4-week very-low-energy diet (VLED) program for adolescents with obesity. Adolescents (13–17 years) with obesity and ≥1 obesity-related complication were Fast Track to Health 52-week randomized controlled trial participants. Adolescents undertook a 4-week micronutrient-complete VLED (800 kcal/day), with weekly dietitian support. Anthropometric data were recorded at baseline and week-4 and side-effects at day 3–4, week-1, -2, -3 and -4. Adolescents completed an acceptability survey at week-4. A total of 134 adolescents (14.9 ± 1.2 years, 50% male) had a 5.5 ± 2.9 kg (p < 0.001) mean weight loss at week-4: 95% experienced ≥1 and 70% experienced ≥3 side-effects during the VLED program, especially during the first week. Hunger, fatigue, headache, irritability, loose stools, constipation and nausea were most common. Reporting more side-effects at day 3–4 correlated with greater weight loss at week-4 (r = −0.188, p = 0.03). Adolescents reported ‘losing weight’ (34%) and ‘prescriptive structure’ (28%) as the most positive aspects of VLED, while ‘restrictive nature’ (45%) and ‘meal replacement taste’ (20%) were least liked. A dietitian-monitored short-term VLED can be implemented safely and is acceptable for many adolescents seeking weight loss, despite frequent side-effects. Investigating predictors of acceptability and effectiveness could determine adolescents most suited to VLED programsen_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherMDPIen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofNutrientsen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0en_AU
dc.titleEfficacy, safety and acceptability of a very-low-energy diet in adolescents with obesity: a fast track to health sub-studyen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/nu16183125
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
dc.relation.nhmrc1128317
dc.relation.nhmrc1158876
dc.relation.nhmrc2017139
dc.relation.nhmrc2009035
dc.relation.nhmrc2009340
dc.relation.nhmrc114574
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::The Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical Schoolen_AU
usyd.citation.volume16en_AU
usyd.citation.issue18en_AU
usyd.citation.spage3125en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.