Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Jessica Anne
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-25T03:29:33Z
dc.date.available2026-05-25T03:29:33Z
dc.date.issued2026en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/35352
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for people with chronic respiratory disease (CRD), yet only 5-10% of eligible patients access a program. PR is predominantly delivered in hospital outpatient settings, with accessibility a key barrier. Most physiotherapists and accredited exercise physiologists (AEPs) work in private practice (PP), an untapped workforce that could deliver PR in primary care, but no funding model currently supports this. This thesis investigated whether upskilling PP physiotherapists and AEPs to deliver PR in primary care is feasible, acceptable and effective. Methods: A two-phase mixed-methods feasibility study comprised: a prospective cohort study of a PR training program for PP clinicians; a randomised controlled feasibility trial comparing an 8-week twice-weekly PR program in PP to usual care for people with COPD and interstitial lung disease; and a qualitative study of patient experiences and acceptability. In addition, a national cross-sectional survey of PP clinician interest and resources was conducted. Results: Training improved clinician knowledge, with 82% achieving the competency threshold post-training compared to 13% pre-training. The feasibility trial randomised 52 participants; 72% completed the intervention. Within-group changes in exercise capacity and HRQoL exceeded minimally important differences, with only one minor adverse event. Qualitative analysis identified high acceptability and a shift away from a passive illness-identity. The survey received 245 eligible responses; 91% of clinicians were interested in delivering PR and most practices had suitable resources, though current funding limited business sustainability. Conclusion: PP physiotherapists and AEPs upskilled in PR can feasibly deliver PR programs with promising clinical outcomes. A full-scale trial with longer-term follow-up is warranted to support advocacy for a funding model.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectPulmonary rehabilitationen_AU
dc.subjectPrimary Careen_AU
dc.subjectCOPDen_AU
dc.subjectILDen_AU
dc.subjectAllied Healthen_AU
dc.subjectSecondary Preventionen_AU
dc.titleIncreasing access to pulmonary rehabilitation through utilising primary careen_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::School of Health Sciencesen_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU
usyd.advisorDennis, Sarah
usyd.include.pubYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.