Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAckermann, Deonna
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-13T10:32:13Z
dc.date.available2026-04-13T10:32:13Z
dc.date.issued2026en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/35105
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating healthcare interventions, but inefficiencies in trial conduct and delays in uptake of effective interventions create waste and widen the evidence-to-practice gap. Studies Within A Trial (SWATs) are embedded sub-studies used to improve trial processes such as recruitment and retention, but their potential to support implementation is underused. Melanoma surveillance is a useful test case because patients require ongoing self-monitoring, increasingly supported by teledermatology, which requires sustained engagement and effective implementation. This thesis examined how SWATs can improve trial efficiency and inform implementation, using the MEL-SELF RCT as a case study. Two scoping reviews found substantial inconsistency in how melanoma surveillance RCTs reported recruitment, retention, outcome completion, and adherence, with limited evaluation of strategies to improve these processes. Four SWATs were embedded in MEL-SELF. A baseline survey identified participant motivations for enrolment, including altruism, personal benefit, and trust in their clinician. A behavioural analysis using the COM-B model identified barriers to skin self-examination and image submission, including low self-efficacy, poor planning, time constraints, technical difficulties, and preference for clinician-led care, and was used to guide adherence support. A randomised SWAT found that motivation-informed reminders did not improve completion of low-complexity trial tasks or more demanding image submissions, suggesting that burden and usability were more important than reminder wording. Another SWAT comparing dermatoscopes found similar clinical usefulness across devices, but better image quality and fewer support needs with the higher-cost polarised device. Overall, this thesis shows that multiple SWATs can be embedded within a single RCT to improve trial conduct and inform implementation of complex interventions.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectMelanomaen
dc.subjectRandomised controlled trialen
dc.subjectStudies Within A Trialen
dc.subjectSWATsen
dc.subjectTeledermatologyen
dc.subjectAdherenceen
dc.titleOptimising Trial Conduct and Generating Translational Gains with Studies Within a Trial (SWATs): A Case Study from the MEL-SELF Randomised Controlled Trial of Patient-Led Surveillanceen
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::The University of Sydney School of Public Healthen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorBell, Katy
usyd.include.pubYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.