Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShan, Jing
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-31T05:44:19Z
dc.date.available2026-03-31T05:44:19Z
dc.date.issued2026en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/35067
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractBackground This thesis examined how antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) can be designed to maximize benefit while minimizing toxicity. It focused on B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed ADCs in multiple myeloma, late-phase ADCs in solid tumors, and disialoganglioside GD2-targeted ADC strategies for osteosarcoma. The aim was to define principles that improve ADC therapeutic index and to develop a grounded “prime and target” strategy for osteosarcoma. Methods Two workstreams were undertaken: (i) a systematic synthesis of efficacy and safety data for BCMA-directed ADCs in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, interpreted alongside phase II/III ADC trials in solid tumors; and (ii) preclinical evaluation of a GD2-targeted naxitamab–DM1 ADC in orthotopic osteosarcoma models, including priming with doxorubicin and tazemetostat (TA). Results BCMA-directed ADCs, particularly belantamab mafodotin, produced meaningful responses but were limited by ocular and hematologic toxicities, which may be reduced through rational combinations, extended dosing intervals, and structured ophthalmic care. In solid tumors, ADC benefit was linked to biomarker strategies and proactive management of class-specific toxicities, including interstitial lung disease and ocular events. In preclinical studies, the naxitamab–DM1 ADC induced on-target mitochondrial apoptosis, suppressed tumor growth, and reduced pulmonary metastases, with greater activity after TA-mediated GD2 upregulation. Brief subcytotoxic doxorubicin exposure increased pro-apoptotic ceramides and, with TA, created a primed tumor state in which sequential doxorubicin–TA–ADC treatment achieved the greatest tumor control without added cardiotoxicity. Conclusions These findings provide a translational framework for safer ADC use and establish a grounded “prime and target” paradigm for GD2-directed ADC therapy in osteosarcoma, informing future biomarker development, ADC engineering, and clinical trial design.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectADCen
dc.subjectantibody-drug conjugatesen
dc.subjectdisialoganglioside GD2en
dc.subjectOsteosarcomaen
dc.subjectEZH2 inhibitoren
dc.subjectup-regulate antigen expressionen
dc.titleAntibody–Drug Conjugates: An Integrative Translational and Evidence Frameworken
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::The University of Sydney School of Pharmacyen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorKayser, Veysel
usyd.include.pubYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.