Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorScahill, Karolina
dc.contributor.authorAlexandre, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorLowen, Petra
dc.contributor.authorMotaghi, Shahrzad
dc.contributor.authorWeese, Scott
dc.contributor.authorCoggins, Sally
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-06T00:11:46Z
dc.date.available2026-03-06T00:11:46Z
dc.date.issued2026-03-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/34961
dc.description.abstractRationale Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a progressive, systemic disease caused by feline coronavirus (FCoV) and characterised by pyogranulomatous inflammation, vasculitis, and variable clinical manifestations. Historically, FIP was considered uniformly fatal, but the emergence of antiviral therapies in recent years has transformed the therapeutic landscape and created an urgent need for rigorous, evidence‑based evaluation of available treatment strategies. Despite increasing research interest, published studies remain highly variable in diagnostic criteria, case definitions, treatment protocols, outcome measures, and methodological quality, making interpretation and comparison challenging. To ensure that the forthcoming treatment guideline addresses the most relevant and clinically meaningful questions, a panel of 16 stakeholders from 10 countries across six continents was formed. Panel members represent a deliberately broad range of perspectives, including general practitioners, specialist clinicians, virologists, cat owners, and breeders. This diverse group collaboratively drafted, refined, and prioritised the key clinical questions using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) framework. This systematic review will support the ISCAID (International Society for Companion Animal Infectious Diseases) guideline and will apply the GRADE framework to rate the certainty of evidence and support trustworthy, actionable recommendations. Objectives • To compare the efficacy of antiviral therapies for FIP on patient-important outcomes, using GS-441524 as the standard-of-care comparator where applicable. • To evaluate how dose category (very low to very high, in mg/kg/day) and treatment duration (short vs long) affect efficacy and safety. • To explore effect modifiers (e.g., FIP form, diagnostic certainty, route and frequency of administration, baseline severity) on response to treatment, as data allow.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0en
dc.subjectSystematic Review Protocolen
dc.subjectFeline Infectious Peritonitisen
dc.titleEfficacy, Dosing, And Duration Of Antiviral Therapy In Feline Infectious Peritonitis: A Systematic Review Protocol To Support Iscaid Fip Treatment Guidelinesen
dc.typeWorkflowen
dc.identifier.doi10.25910/m4hk-jh87
dc.rights.otherThis protocol is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY‑NC‑ND 4.0) licence. This licence allows others to download and share the work with proper attribution, but not to change it in any way or use it for commercial purposes. More information about this licence is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.relation.otherAustralian Companion Animal Health Foundation
usyd.facultyInternational Veterinary Evidence-based Guideline Centre, The Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagenen
usyd.facultyDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canadaen
usyd.facultyFaculty of Science, Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydneyen
usyd.facultyOntario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canadaen
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.