Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLuca, Edward Joseph
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T01:35:24Z
dc.date.available2026-02-06T01:35:24Z
dc.date.issued2025en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/34819
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractThe value of academic research is increasingly quantified through research metrics, including individual, journal, and institutional rankings. These measures are used to allocate research funding, inform hiring and promotion, and assess scholarly contributions. An emphasis on metrification reshapes academic work, challenging academic values and identities, and creating a managerial environment that privileges certain research and publication strategies. This thesis examines academics’ attitudes and behaviours towards research metrics and the research impact agenda through a comparative qualitative case study of two Australian business schools. Through in-depth interviews with 38 academics and a document analysis of institutional research policies, I investigate how academics navigate competing metrics and managerial objectives, exploring the implications for individual researchers, universities, and academic flourishing. While a narrow focus on measurable outcomes may appear strategic from an administrative perspective, it risks stifling creativity, innovation, and the less quantifiable aspects of academic work that enhance wellbeing. I contextualise this study with an historical analysis of Australian government research policies, tracing the evolution of a research agenda prioritising societal and economic impacts over scholarly impact. Drawing on institutional logics, I contrast the traditional logic of academic excellence with the emerging logic of impact, analysing the consequences of shifting priorities for academic work. Based on my results, I argue for greater metrics literacy among academics and administrators, so that researchers can make more informed and meaningful decisions about their research agenda and research outputs. With a deeper understanding of metrics and their implications, the academic community can preserve the epistemic integrity of knowledge creation and promote a scholarly culture that supports wellbeing and academic flourishing.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectResearch metricsen
dc.subjectscholarly publishingen
dc.subjectresearch impacten
dc.subjecthuman flourishingen
dc.subjectmanagerialismen
dc.subjectacademic wellbeingen
dc.titleAcademic autonomy in the managerial university: The impact of metrification on academic flourishingen
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Business School::Discipline of Business Information Systemsen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorBoell, Sebastian
usyd.include.pubYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.