Cancer mortality in kidney transplant recipients: An Australian and New Zealand population-based cohort study, 1980-2013
Access status:
Open Access
Type
ArticleAuthor/s
Rosales, BrendaDe La Mata, Nicole
Vajdic, Claire
Kelly, Patrick
Wyburn, Kate
Webster, Angela
Abstract
Cancer burden is increasing in kidney transplant recipients, but differences in mortality compared to the general population remain unclear. We sought to compare cancer mortality in paediatric and adult kidney transplant recipients with the general population and describe any ...
See moreCancer burden is increasing in kidney transplant recipients, but differences in mortality compared to the general population remain unclear. We sought to compare cancer mortality in paediatric and adult kidney transplant recipients with the general population and describe any differences, by site, age and sex, country and over time. We included kidney transplant recipients from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplantation Registry, 1980–2013. Date of death and underlying cause of death were ascertained by data-linkage and classified using ICD10AM codes. Indirect standardisation was used to estimate standardised mortality ratios (SMR). There were 5,284 deaths in 17,628 kidney transplant recipients over 175,084 person-years of observation, including 1,061 (20%) cancer deaths. Relative cancer mortality was higher than the general population for all-site (SMR 2.9, 95% CI 2.7–3.1) cancer and highest for nonmelanoma skin cancer (SMR 50.9, 95% CI 43.5–59.6) and lymphoma (SMR 42.2, 95% CI 35.3–50.5). Relative cancer mortality decreased with increasing age in men (p < 0.001) and women (p = 0.001) but never reached parity with the general population. Relative mortality did not change with age for skin and lip, or colorectal cancers (p-value >0.1). Only relative colorectal cancer mortality increased over time (p = 0.002). Our study shows cancer mortality in kidney transplant recipients was higher than expected in the general population. The magnitude of excess mortality varied by cancer site, age and sex. Further evidence is needed to identify whether this variation is due to differences at diagnosis or access and effectiveness of cancer treatments in this population.
See less
See moreCancer burden is increasing in kidney transplant recipients, but differences in mortality compared to the general population remain unclear. We sought to compare cancer mortality in paediatric and adult kidney transplant recipients with the general population and describe any differences, by site, age and sex, country and over time. We included kidney transplant recipients from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplantation Registry, 1980–2013. Date of death and underlying cause of death were ascertained by data-linkage and classified using ICD10AM codes. Indirect standardisation was used to estimate standardised mortality ratios (SMR). There were 5,284 deaths in 17,628 kidney transplant recipients over 175,084 person-years of observation, including 1,061 (20%) cancer deaths. Relative cancer mortality was higher than the general population for all-site (SMR 2.9, 95% CI 2.7–3.1) cancer and highest for nonmelanoma skin cancer (SMR 50.9, 95% CI 43.5–59.6) and lymphoma (SMR 42.2, 95% CI 35.3–50.5). Relative cancer mortality decreased with increasing age in men (p < 0.001) and women (p = 0.001) but never reached parity with the general population. Relative mortality did not change with age for skin and lip, or colorectal cancers (p-value >0.1). Only relative colorectal cancer mortality increased over time (p = 0.002). Our study shows cancer mortality in kidney transplant recipients was higher than expected in the general population. The magnitude of excess mortality varied by cancer site, age and sex. Further evidence is needed to identify whether this variation is due to differences at diagnosis or access and effectiveness of cancer treatments in this population.
See less
Date
2020Source title
International Journal of CancerVolume
146Issue
10Publisher
WileyLicence
OtherRights statement
This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley’s Self-Archiving Policy.Faculty/School
Faculty of Medicine and HealthShare