Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChang, Kuo-yi Jade
dc.contributor.authorYen, Ivy
dc.contributor.authorBobo, Firew
dc.contributor.authorHollier, Joel
dc.contributor.authorSmith-Merry, Jennifer
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-12T03:24:13Z
dc.date.available2026-01-12T03:24:13Z
dc.date.issued2026en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/34676
dc.description.abstractPsychosocial interventions support functional recovery and social integration for people with severe mental illness (SMI); however, their implementation remains fragmented and inconsistent. This rapid scoping review maps the landscape of psychosocial interventions for adults with SMI in high-income countries, identifying their key components, implementation challenges, and strategies to optimise delivery. Following the Cochrane rapid review guidelines, we searched MEDLINE and CINAHL (January 2009 - May 2024) and conducted manual reference screening. Eligible studies focused on non-pharmacological, community-based interventions. Thematic analysis was used to identify implementation barriers and enablers. Of 8,624 screened records, 464 studies met inclusion criteria, covering 15 intervention types. Cognitive-focused interventions (n = 100) supported employment (n = 86), and behavioural therapies (n = 66) were most studied. Outcomes focused on symptom (n = 179), daily living skills (n = 160), and cognitive states (n = 157). Implementation was often constrained by systemic, organisational, and individual-level barriers. Systemic challenges included fragmented services, stigma, cultural and linguistic barriers, and economic constraints, highlighting the need for integrated care models, policy reforms, and culturally responsive approaches. Organisational challenges such as staff resistance, insufficient training, and resource limitations underscored the importance of leadership, stakeholder engagement, and investment. At the individual level, low motivation, logistical difficulties, trauma histories, and goal misalignment reduced engagement and retention, highlighting the need for flexible, person-centred, trauma-informed approaches, strong social networks, and a balance between structure and adaptability. Selecting, adapting, and funding psychosocial interventions remain complex. This review provides a foundation for future systematic reviews of homogeneous intervention subsets to better inform policy and practice.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCommunity Mental Health Journalen
dc.relation.ispartofCommunity Mental Health Journalen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0en
dc.subjectsevere mental illnessen
dc.subjectPsychosocial interventionen
dc.subjectfunctional recoveryen
dc.subjectcommunity-based mental health supporten
dc.titleImplementing community-based psychosocial interventions for adults with severe mental illness in high-income countries: a rapid scoping reviewen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10597-025-01583-5
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
dc.relation.arcIL230100154
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Centre for Disability Research and Policyen
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.