Internationalization through Co-Creating Institutions: the Case of Blockchain
Access status:
USyd Access
Type
ThesisThesis type
Doctor of PhilosophyAuthor/s
Du, JuanAbstract
Institutions are often treated as established variables in the International Business (IB) field. Despite
the important role of common institutions in cross-border activities, how firms participate in the
processes of developing institutions globally has received scant scholarly ...
See moreInstitutions are often treated as established variables in the International Business (IB) field. Despite the important role of common institutions in cross-border activities, how firms participate in the processes of developing institutions globally has received scant scholarly attention. This thesis challenges a conventional assumption that institutions are pre-existing factors exogenous to firm activities. It illuminates different pathways followed by firms to co-create common standards in a nascent technological field. The thesis comprises three articles that complement each other. The first article problematizes 101 studies published between 2014-2023. It uncovers a prevailing assumption in IB that takes institutions as factors pre-existing to firm activities. It proposes alternative assumptions that treat firms as co-creators of institutions in the context of digital innovations. The second article examines challenges faced by firms while realizing blockchain’s potential as a general-purpose technology in IB context. It proposes a framework for firms to develop valuable use cases, align stakeholder visions and build viable blockchain-based solutions. The third article draws on the theory of institutional fields to investigate how firms participate in common standard-making to enable the global adoption of blockchain. It discusses how firms pursue different pathways to global standardization, as a central actor, consortium members, and peripheral actors. The thesis triangulates between documentary, interview and observational data collected from firms based in 12 jurisdictions between 2021-2024. It builds on multi-level analysis of how individuals, a single firm and consortia of firms participate in global standard-making via bottom-up, top-down, and bespoke pathways. It brings an IB dimension to the theory of institutional fields and highlights the importance of global adoption as a key process to establish common standards in a nascent technological field.
See less
See moreInstitutions are often treated as established variables in the International Business (IB) field. Despite the important role of common institutions in cross-border activities, how firms participate in the processes of developing institutions globally has received scant scholarly attention. This thesis challenges a conventional assumption that institutions are pre-existing factors exogenous to firm activities. It illuminates different pathways followed by firms to co-create common standards in a nascent technological field. The thesis comprises three articles that complement each other. The first article problematizes 101 studies published between 2014-2023. It uncovers a prevailing assumption in IB that takes institutions as factors pre-existing to firm activities. It proposes alternative assumptions that treat firms as co-creators of institutions in the context of digital innovations. The second article examines challenges faced by firms while realizing blockchain’s potential as a general-purpose technology in IB context. It proposes a framework for firms to develop valuable use cases, align stakeholder visions and build viable blockchain-based solutions. The third article draws on the theory of institutional fields to investigate how firms participate in common standard-making to enable the global adoption of blockchain. It discusses how firms pursue different pathways to global standardization, as a central actor, consortium members, and peripheral actors. The thesis triangulates between documentary, interview and observational data collected from firms based in 12 jurisdictions between 2021-2024. It builds on multi-level analysis of how individuals, a single firm and consortia of firms participate in global standard-making via bottom-up, top-down, and bespoke pathways. It brings an IB dimension to the theory of institutional fields and highlights the importance of global adoption as a key process to establish common standards in a nascent technological field.
See less
Date
2025Rights statement
The author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.Faculty/School
The University of Sydney Business School, Discipline of International BusinessAwarding institution
The University of SydneyShare