Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGosden-Kaye, Emily
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-04T05:26:55Z
dc.date.available2025-08-04T05:26:55Z
dc.date.issued2025en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/34184
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractThis thesis draws on intersectionality and embodiment to present a feminist inquiry into the experience of women with intellectual disabilities in the NDIS. The thesis and project centre on the question: What are the experiences of women with intellectual disabilities in the NDIS? I locate concepts of disability – be this historical, social, or cultural - in the views of those with jurisdiction over the Scheme, such as legislators, advocates and the women themselves. My project entails deconstructing experience by adopting intersectionality and embodiment. Intersectionality is understood here as a theoretical perspective that looks at power relations to centre the perspectives of those ‘marginalised’. Embodiment describes the relationships between systems and those that use them, centring on the body to move away from the mind. My enquiry, then, is strongly influenced by the approach of feminists, but I counter their indifference to intellectual disabilities by considering insights from feminist disability scholars. The primary method of investigation has been through mixed methods that contrast the voices of people with intellectual disability with more abstract representations of these groups in policy, reports and NDIS plans. The findings reveal that legislators saw gender in narrow terms, failing to understand interconnections to broader structural barriers. Advocacy groups focus on bodily autonomy and the state's role in regulating gender. In contrast, the NDIS plans and the photovoice highlight that women and men were concerned with community, discrimination, socialising and planning issues. Themes within these narratives spoke to complex problems of identity, power, subjugation and exclusion. The findings propose that disability support systems must address gender with other aspects of identity. Disability and gender are constantly in dialogue, and I have suggested the requirement to conceptualising disability in the NDIS in alternative ways.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectWomen with Intellectual Disabilitiesen
dc.subjectIntersectionalityen
dc.subjectEmbodimenten
dc.subjectThe National Disability Insurance Schemeen
dc.subjectFeminismen
dc.subjectIndividualised Fundingen
dc.titlePOLITICISING DISABILITY: Women with Intellectual Disabilities Negotiating the National Disability Insurance Schemeen
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::The University of Sydney School of Public Healthen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorO'Donovan, Mary-Ann
usyd.include.pubYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.