Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMohseni, Aryan
dc.contributor.authorDonald, Scott
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-31T00:03:12Z
dc.date.available2025-07-31T00:03:12Z
dc.date.issued2025en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/34168
dc.description.abstractAustralia's national superannuation system enlivens a complex collage of Commonwealth and State laws and regulatory regimes. It therefore provides an opportunity to explore the operation of legislative devices designed to resolve issues of overlap in a practical setting of considerable consequence. This article assesses two of these devices: s 350 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) and s 5E of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), and identifies the crucial role played by s 109 of the Australian Constitution in the curatorial process governed by those provisions. The article is also concerned with the potential for less obvious examples of regulatory overlap to go unnoticed, and examines specific examples that illustrate this potential.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherLawbook Co Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Law Journalen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectSection 1098en
dc.subjectFederalismen
dc.subjectInconsistencyen
dc.subjectConstitutional lawen
dc.subjectConstitutional pre-emptionen
dc.subjectStatutory interpretationen
dc.subjectSuperannuation lawen
dc.subjectSuperannuation trustsen
dc.subjectEquity and Trustsen
dc.subjectTrusts lawen
dc.titleResolving Statutory Overlap in the Superannuation Systemen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.2139/ssrn.5151045
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law Schoolen
usyd.citation.volume99en
usyd.citation.issue2en
usyd.citation.spage114en
usyd.citation.epage131en
workflow.metadata.onlyYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

There are no files associated with this item.

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.