Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMohseni, Aryan
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-28T01:03:50Z
dc.date.available2025-07-28T01:03:50Z
dc.date.issued2025en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/34145
dc.description.abstractThe nature of a trustee's indemnity has been the subject of recent appellate judicial treatment in the United Kingdom and in Australia. Owing to the prevalence of the trading trust in Australia, the High Court of Australia has recently had occasion to consider whether a successor trustee owes a fiduciary duty to not frustrate a former trustee's indemnity over trust assets. That decision has addressed divergences between Australia and the United Kingdom on the nature of the indemnity and reminds us of fundamental starting points about the law of trusts that are often forgotten.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofTrusts & Trusteesen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0en
dc.subjectEquitable proprietary rightsen
dc.subjectEquitable remediesen
dc.subjectEquityen
dc.subjectThird party liabilityen
dc.subjectTrusteesen
dc.subjectTrustee indemnitiesen
dc.subjectLienen
dc.subjectFiduciary relationshipsen
dc.subjectFiduciary dutiesen
dc.subjectAccessorial liabilityen
dc.subjectEquitable chargeen
dc.subjectTrustee successionen
dc.subjectTrusts lawen
dc.titleDoes a successor trustee owe a fiduciary obligation to the former trustee not to frustrate their indemnity?en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/tandt/ttaf026
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law Schoolen
usyd.citation.volume31en
usyd.citation.issue7en
usyd.citation.spage1en
usyd.citation.epage4en
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.