Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Chao
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-13T01:15:28Z
dc.date.available2025-05-13T01:15:28Z
dc.date.issued2025en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/33898
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractPatients with vertigo can be categorised into syndromes, each with two main differential diagnoses. Syndromes include acute vestibular syndrome (AVS), typically caused by vestibular neuritis (VN) or posterior circulation stroke (PCS), and recurrent spontaneous vertigo (RSV), usually due to vestibular migraine (VM) or Menière’s disease (MD). For both AVS and RSV, clinicians use information from the history, bedside examination and investigations to determine the diagnosis, but this task can be challenging, particularly for non-experts. This thesis aimed to develop and validate machine learning models to differentiate VM from MD and VN from PCS and to tailor these models for clinicians with various levels of expertise. For RSV patients, models used different combinations of data from history, examination and vestibular tests to simulate various clinical settings. These models separated VM and MD with accuracies of 97.8%, 94.5% and 92.3% for the neuro-otology clinic, general neurology/otolaryngology clinic and primary care respectively. Using a similar approach, models aimed at clinicians reviewing AVS patients in the Emergency Room differentiated VN and PCS with accuracies of 96.6% for those with neuro-otology support, 94.6% for non-experts with access to the video head impulse test (VHIT), and 88.8% for non-experts using history and basic bedside examination only. Finally, models that used only raw VHIT data to distinguish VN from PCS achieved 87.8% accuracy when evaluated on an external dataset, with performance superior to the optimal gain cut-off and not significantly different from that of experts. The findings of this thesis demonstrate that machine learning models can accurately differentiate VM from MD and VN from PCS using clinical data. These models hold promise as diagnostic decision aids, suitable not only for subspecialists but also non-experts without neuro-otology expertise or resources, thereby bridging diagnostic gaps in current clinical practice.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectvertigoen_AU
dc.subjectmachine learningen_AU
dc.subjectvestibular neuritisen_AU
dc.subjectstrokeen_AU
dc.subjectvestibular migraineen_AU
dc.subjectMeniere's diseaseen_AU
dc.titleDifferential diagnosis of vertigo using machine learning techniquesen_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Central Clinical Schoolen_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU
usyd.advisorWelgampola, Miriam
usyd.include.pubYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.