Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorConaglen, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-02T05:39:36Z
dc.date.available2024-12-02T05:39:36Z
dc.date.issued2013en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/33355
dc.description.abstractThis article addresses some aspects of the interaction between statute and the general law duties governing directors' conflicts of interest. In order to understand that interaction fully, it is instructive first to recognise the interaction between different kinds of general law duties owed by directors, as that helps to elucidate the role played by fiduciary doctrine's general conflict principles. The article then explores two aspects of the interaction between the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and those general law duties, investigating in particular the effect of the statutory regime on fiduciary doctrine's profit principle and on the effectiveness of conflicts authorisation clauses in company constitutions. The legislative history of the Corporations Act makes it relevant to consider the equivalent position in England as well.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherThomson Reutersen
dc.relation.ispartofCompany and Securities Law Journalen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectstatute lawen
dc.subjectCorporations Act 2001 (Cth)en
dc.subjectgeneral lawen
dc.subjectdirectors' conflicts of interesten
dc.subjectfiduciary doctrineen
dc.subjectdirectors' dutiesen
dc.subjectEngland positionen
dc.titleInteraction between statutory and general law duties concerning company director conflictsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
dc.rights.otherThis article was published by Thomson Reuters and should be cited as: Conaglen, M. (2013). Interaction between statutory and general law duties concerning company director conflicts. Company and Securities Law Journal, 31(7), 403–422. For all subscription inquiries please phone, from Australia: 1300 304 195, from Overseas: +61 2 8587 7980 or online at legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/search. The official PDF version of this article can also be purchased separately from Thomson Reuters at http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/subscribe-or-purchase. This publication is copyright. Other than for the purposes of and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of it may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited. PO Box 3502, Rozelle NSW 2039. legal.thomsonreuters.com.auen
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law Schoolen
usyd.citation.volume31en
usyd.citation.issue7en
usyd.citation.spage403en
usyd.citation.epage422en
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.