Sexual boundary violations by doctors - Context, regulatory consequences and preventive strategies
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | O’Connor, Mike | |
dc.contributor.author | Rudge, Christopher | |
dc.contributor.author | Stewart, Cameron | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-11-06T07:23:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-11-06T07:23:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/33242 | |
dc.description.abstract | While sexual boundary violations by doctors (SBVs) are viewed with utmost seriousness by disciplinary bodies and tribunals, complaints of SBVs in Australia continue to increase. In 2023, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (Ahpra) outlined a "blueprint" to protect patients better from sexual misconduct in healthcare: reform being considered in 2024, by Australian health ministers. Few analyses or studies have offered an overview of the prevalence, effects, and causes of SBVs, nor the duties, liabilities, possible disciplinary action against, and potential treatment of, doctors who commit them. This column offers such an overview, and considers, additionally, whether doctors who may have psychiatric disorders associated with their boundary violations would be suitable candidates for treatment. Ultimately, we contend that a purely "responsive" approach is inadequate, and preventive measures such as screening and more effective education should be considered in medical schools as a way of reducing the incidence of SBVs. | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en | en_AU |
dc.publisher | Thomson Reuters | en_AU |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Law and Medicine | en_AU |
dc.rights | Copyright All Rights Reserved | en_AU |
dc.subject | sexual boundary violations | en_AU |
dc.subject | boundary crossing | en_AU |
dc.subject | medical practice | en_AU |
dc.subject | health practitioner misconduct | en_AU |
dc.title | Sexual boundary violations by doctors - Context, regulatory consequences and preventive strategies | en_AU |
dc.type | Article | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | ANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4804 Law in context::480408 Law, science and technology | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | ANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4804 Law in context::480412 Medical and health law | en_AU |
dc.type.pubtype | Publisher's version | en_AU |
dc.rights.other | This article was published by Thomson Reuters in the Journal of Law and Medicine and should be cited as O’Connor, M., Rudge, C., & Stewart, C. (2024). Sexual boundary violations by doctors - Context, regulatory consequences and preventive strategies. Journal of Law and Medicine, 31(1), 70–87. For all subscription inquiries please phone, from Australia: 1300 304 195, from Overseas: +61 2 8587 7980 or online at legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/search. The official PDF version of this article can also be purchased separately from Thomson Reuters at http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/subscribe-or-purchase. This publication is copyright. Other than for the purposes of and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of it may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited. PO Box 3502, Rozelle NSW 2039. legal.thomsonreuters.com.au | en_AU |
usyd.faculty | SeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law School | en_AU |
usyd.citation.volume | 31 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.issue | 1 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.spage | 70 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.epage | 87 | en_AU |
workflow.metadata.only | No | en_AU |
Associated file/s
Associated collections