Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRudge, Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-06T07:05:41Z
dc.date.available2024-11-06T07:05:41Z
dc.date.issued2024en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/33241
dc.description.abstractOver recent years, dozens of legal challenges have been instituted in response to government action during the COVID-19 pandemic. While public health orders have been challenged on several grounds, few cases have succeeded. Fewer cases still have called into question decisions made by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) to approve the COVID-19 vaccines. This section provides a brief update on one recent, partially successful COVID-19 health directions case before examining two applications in the Federal Court of Australia seeking judicial review of the TGA's approval of the COVID-19 vaccines. The section argues that, while both TGA applications were dismissed for lack of standing, they illustrate how and why third parties will ordinarily not be entitled to challenge administrative decisions about therapeutic goods.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherThomson Reutersen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Law and Medicineen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectvaccine mandatesen_AU
dc.subjectCOVID-19 vaccinesen_AU
dc.subjecttherapeutic goodsen_AU
dc.subjectmedical practitionersen_AU
dc.subjectpurposivismen_AU
dc.subjectgene technologiesen_AU
dc.subjectgenetically modified organismen_AU
dc.titleChallenging pandemic law: From vaccine mandates to judicial review of vaccine approvalsen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4804 Law in context::480412 Medical and health lawen_AU
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4804 Law in context::480408 Law, science and technologyen_AU
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
dc.rights.otherThis article was published by Thomson Reuters in the Journal of Law and Medicine and should be cited as Rudge, C. (2024). Challenging pandemic law: From vaccine mandates to judicial review of vaccine approvals. Journal of Law and Medicine, 31(2), 225–243. For all subscription inquiries please phone, from Australia: 1300 304 195, from Overseas: +61 2 8587 7980 or online at legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/search. The official PDF version of this article can also be purchased separately from Thomson Reuters at http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/subscribe-or-purchase. This publication is copyright. Other than for the purposes of and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of it may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited. PO Box 3502, Rozelle NSW 2039. legal.thomsonreuters.com.auen_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law Schoolen_AU
usyd.citation.volume31en_AU
usyd.citation.issue2en_AU
usyd.citation.spage225en_AU
usyd.citation.epage243en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.