Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRudge, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorAttinger, Sara
dc.contributor.authorKerridge, Ian
dc.contributor.authorLipworth, Wendy
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Cameron
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-06T06:49:26Z
dc.date.available2024-11-06T06:49:26Z
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/33240
dc.description.abstractThis article examines recent reforms to the regulatory framework for biologicals contained in the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (Cth) in the context of the "New Frontier" of reform envisioned in a report completed by the Commonwealth Government in 2021. It compares Australia's proposed reform of the approval processes for biologicals to similar reforms that have been made over the last three decades in the United States and the European Union. It places the Australian reforms in the context of the commercialisation of regenerative medicine and identifies several potential shortcomings of the proposed reforms and reports on the current lack of data on the processes of expedited approvals in Australia more generally.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherThomson Reutersen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Law and Medicineen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectbiologicalsen
dc.subjecttherapeutic goodsen
dc.subjectinnovationen
dc.subjectregulationen
dc.subjectapproval processesen
dc.subjectpatient accessen
dc.titleA new priority pathway for biologicals in Australia: Contextualising and evaluating the proposed reformsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4804 Law in context::480412 Medical and health lawen
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4804 Law in context::480408 Law, science and technologyen
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
dc.rights.otherThis article was published by Thomson Reuters in the Journal of Law and Medicine and should be cited as Rudge, C., Attinger, S., Kerridge, I., Lipworth, W., & Stewart, C. (2022). A new priority pathway for biologicals in Australia: Contextualising and evaluating the proposed reforms. Journal of Law and Medicine, 29(3), 677–699. For all subscription inquiries please phone, from Australia: 1300 304 195, from Overseas: +61 2 8587 7980 or online at legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/search. The official PDF version of this article can also be purchased separately from Thomson Reuters at http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/subscribe-or-purchase. This publication is copyright. Other than for the purposes of and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of it may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited. PO Box 3502, Rozelle NSW 2039. legal.thomsonreuters.com.auen
dc.relation.otherAPP2007623
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law Schoolen
usyd.citation.volume29en
usyd.citation.issue3en
usyd.citation.spage677en
usyd.citation.epage699en
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.