Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Cameron
dc.contributor.authorRudge, Christopher
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T00:49:20Z
dc.date.available2024-10-17T00:49:20Z
dc.date.issued2022en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/33165
dc.description.abstractThis section examines the 2022 decision of Pridgeon v Medical Council of New South Wales in the New South Wales Court of Appeal that has taken a fundamentally different view of the public interest test employed in immediate action hearings under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law. The section starts by examining the case and then looks at the approach taken by subsequent decisions. It will argue that the decision is substantially at odds with earlier authorities from all around Australia and fails to understand properly the meaning and purpose of the test.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherThomson Reutersen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Law and Medicineen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectpublic interesten_AU
dc.subjectimmediate actionen_AU
dc.subjectdisciplinary actionen_AU
dc.titleThrowing a cat among the Pridgeon(s): The New South Wales Court of Appeal and the public interest test under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Lawen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4804 Law in context::480412 Medical and health lawen_AU
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4804 Law in context::480410 Legal theory, jurisprudence and legal interpretationen_AU
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4804 Law in context::480405 Law and society and socio-legal researchen_AU
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
dc.rights.otherThis article was published by Thomson Reuters in the Journal of Law and Medicine and should be cited as Stewart, C., & Rudge, C. (2022). Throwing a cat among the Pridgeon(s): the New South Wales Court of Appeal and the public interest test under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law. Journal of Law and Medicine, 29(4), 1011–1025. For all subscription inquiries please phone, from Australia: 1300 304 195, from Overseas: +61 2 8587 7980 or online at legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/search. The official PDF version of this article can also be purchased separately from Thomson Reuters at http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/subscribe-or-purchase. This publication is copyright. Other than for the purposes of and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of it may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited. PO Box 3502, Rozelle NSW 2039. legal.thomsonreuters.com.auen_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law Schoolen_AU
usyd.citation.volume29en_AU
usyd.citation.issue4en_AU
usyd.citation.spage1011en_AU
usyd.citation.epage1025en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.