Throwing a cat among the Pridgeon(s): The New South Wales Court of Appeal and the public interest test under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Stewart, Cameron | |
dc.contributor.author | Rudge, Christopher | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-17T00:49:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-17T00:49:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/33165 | |
dc.description.abstract | This section examines the 2022 decision of Pridgeon v Medical Council of New South Wales in the New South Wales Court of Appeal that has taken a fundamentally different view of the public interest test employed in immediate action hearings under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law. The section starts by examining the case and then looks at the approach taken by subsequent decisions. It will argue that the decision is substantially at odds with earlier authorities from all around Australia and fails to understand properly the meaning and purpose of the test. | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en | en_AU |
dc.publisher | Thomson Reuters | en_AU |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Law and Medicine | en_AU |
dc.rights | Copyright All Rights Reserved | en_AU |
dc.subject | public interest | en_AU |
dc.subject | immediate action | en_AU |
dc.subject | disciplinary action | en_AU |
dc.title | Throwing a cat among the Pridgeon(s): The New South Wales Court of Appeal and the public interest test under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law | en_AU |
dc.type | Article | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | ANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4804 Law in context::480412 Medical and health law | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | ANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4804 Law in context::480410 Legal theory, jurisprudence and legal interpretation | en_AU |
dc.subject.asrc | ANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4804 Law in context::480405 Law and society and socio-legal research | en_AU |
dc.type.pubtype | Publisher's version | en_AU |
dc.rights.other | This article was published by Thomson Reuters in the Journal of Law and Medicine and should be cited as Stewart, C., & Rudge, C. (2022). Throwing a cat among the Pridgeon(s): the New South Wales Court of Appeal and the public interest test under the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law. Journal of Law and Medicine, 29(4), 1011–1025. For all subscription inquiries please phone, from Australia: 1300 304 195, from Overseas: +61 2 8587 7980 or online at legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/search. The official PDF version of this article can also be purchased separately from Thomson Reuters at http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/subscribe-or-purchase. This publication is copyright. Other than for the purposes of and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of it may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited. PO Box 3502, Rozelle NSW 2039. legal.thomsonreuters.com.au | en_AU |
usyd.faculty | SeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law School | en_AU |
usyd.citation.volume | 29 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.issue | 4 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.spage | 1011 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.epage | 1025 | en_AU |
workflow.metadata.only | No | en_AU |
Associated file/s
Associated collections