Brain death and pregnancy: on the legalities of post-mortem gestation
| Field | Value | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | Stewart, Cameron | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kerridge, Ian | |
| dc.contributor.author | O’Reilly, Lisa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sheahan, Linda | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tomossy, George | |
| dc.contributor.author | Skowronsk, George | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-17T00:27:55Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-10-17T00:27:55Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/33160 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This column examines a 2020 decision of the Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory, Millard v Australian Capital Territory [2020] ACTSC 138, which dealt with a dispute concerning a brain dead pregnant woman and whether treatment to sustain her body should have been continued to save the life of her fetus. The column compares the case to other cases from overseas jurisdictions to examine the question of whether there is any jurisdiction which would authorise the continuation of care in such circumstances. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Thomson Reuters | en |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Law and Medicine | en |
| dc.rights | Copyright All Rights Reserved | en |
| dc.subject | brain death | en |
| dc.subject | pregnancy | en |
| dc.subject | fetus | en |
| dc.subject | jurisdiction | en |
| dc.subject | human tissue | en |
| dc.subject | anatomical examination | en |
| dc.title | Brain death and pregnancy: on the legalities of post-mortem gestation | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.subject.asrc | ANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4804 Law in context::480412 Medical and health law | en |
| dc.type.pubtype | Publisher's version | en |
| dc.rights.other | This article was published by Thomson Reuters in the Journal of Law and Medicine and should be cited as Stewart, C., Kerridge, I., O’Reilly, L., Sheahan, L., Tomossy, G., & Skowronski, G. (2020). Brain death and pregnancy: on the legalities of post-mortem gestation. Journal of Law and Medicine, 28(1), 75–89. For all subscription inquiries please phone, from Australia: 1300 304 195, from Overseas: +61 2 8587 7980 or online at legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/search. The official PDF version of this article can also be purchased separately from Thomson Reuters at http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/subscribe-or-purchase. This publication is copyright. Other than for the purposes of and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of it may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited. PO Box 3502, Rozelle NSW 2039. legal.thomsonreuters.com.au | en |
| usyd.faculty | SeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law School | en |
| usyd.citation.volume | 28 | en |
| usyd.citation.issue | 1 | en |
| usyd.citation.spage | 75 | en |
| usyd.citation.epage | 89 | en |
| workflow.metadata.only | No | en |
Associated file/s
Associated collections