Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Cameron
dc.contributor.authorEckstein, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorNicol, Dianne
dc.contributor.authorNielsen, Jane
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-16T22:37:21Z
dc.date.available2024-10-16T22:37:21Z
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/33154
dc.description.abstractThis section examines current debates about the test for standards of care in negligence under the Civil Liability Acts in Australia, and how those debates may impact adversely on innovations in health care. It examines the recent history of attempts to define and regulate health innovation and compares them to judicial determinations from New South Wales that have potential to limit the protections otherwise afforded to competent professional practice. The section argues that, if those protections are eroded, alternative options to protect and encourage innovation should be explored, most especially a resuscitated defence of the voluntary assumption of risk.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherThomson Reutersen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Law and Medicineen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectnegligenceen
dc.subjectstandards of careen
dc.subjectCivil Liability Actsen
dc.subjecthealth innovationen
dc.titleNegligence and health innovation: Issues with the standard of care and the need to revisit the voluntary assumption of risken
dc.typeArticleen
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4804 Law in context::480412 Medical and health lawen
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
dc.relation.arcDP180101262
dc.rights.otherThis article was published by Thomson Reuters in the Journal of Law and Medicine and should be cited as Stewart, C., Eckstein, L., Nicol, D., & Nielsen, J. (2022). Negligence and health innovation: Issues with the standard of care and the need to revisit the voluntary assumption of risk. Journal of Law and Medicine, 29(2), 337–348. For all subscription inquiries please phone, from Australia: 1300 304 195, from Overseas: +61 2 8587 7980 or online at legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/search. The official PDF version of this article can also be purchased separately from Thomson Reuters at http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/subscribe-or-purchase. This publication is copyright. Other than for the purposes of and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of it may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited. PO Box 3502, Rozelle NSW 2039. legal.thomsonreuters.com.auen
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law Schoolen
usyd.citation.volume29en
usyd.citation.issue2en
usyd.citation.spage337en
usyd.citation.epage348en
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.