Research Paper for Legal Aid NSW: Civil detention for high risk offenders
Access status:
Open Access
Type
Report, ResearchAuthor/s
Desai, IshaHodge, Sebastian
Barrell, Adam
Filer, Anastacia
Chan, Shannon
Evans, Sophie
Chan, Yi Jia
Abstract
This report investigates alternative approaches to post-sentence preventive detention, focusing on the locations where such sentences are served and the policies in two domestic and four international jurisdictions. It also examines non-prison detention models for high-risk offenders ...
See moreThis report investigates alternative approaches to post-sentence preventive detention, focusing on the locations where such sentences are served and the policies in two domestic and four international jurisdictions. It also examines non-prison detention models for high-risk offenders from three additional countries. The analysis aims to determine whether these models can improve the effectiveness of New South Wales’ current post-sentence regime while balancing community safety and offender rehabilitation. After outlining the theoretical foundations of post-sentence detention, the report assesses in-prison approaches in Victoria and Queensland, and contrasts them with alternative detention models in Germany, Yemen, Denmark, and Norway. The report highlights the potential of specialized cognitive and behavioural rehabilitation programs, drawing on successful models in Singapore, New Zealand, and Canada. The findings support the integration of community-based and non-prison facilities into post-sentence detention frameworks to reduce recidivism and enhance reintegration outcomes. Due to scope limitations, further research is recommended to assess the practical application of these models in NSW.
See less
See moreThis report investigates alternative approaches to post-sentence preventive detention, focusing on the locations where such sentences are served and the policies in two domestic and four international jurisdictions. It also examines non-prison detention models for high-risk offenders from three additional countries. The analysis aims to determine whether these models can improve the effectiveness of New South Wales’ current post-sentence regime while balancing community safety and offender rehabilitation. After outlining the theoretical foundations of post-sentence detention, the report assesses in-prison approaches in Victoria and Queensland, and contrasts them with alternative detention models in Germany, Yemen, Denmark, and Norway. The report highlights the potential of specialized cognitive and behavioural rehabilitation programs, drawing on successful models in Singapore, New Zealand, and Canada. The findings support the integration of community-based and non-prison facilities into post-sentence detention frameworks to reduce recidivism and enhance reintegration outcomes. Due to scope limitations, further research is recommended to assess the practical application of these models in NSW.
See less
Date
2023Source title
Sydney Policy Reform ProjectPublisher
Sydney Policy Reform ProjectLicence
Copyright All Rights ReservedRights statement
This document has been prepared by students of the University of Sydney as part of the Sydney Policy Reform Project and is provided “as is”. You are free to share (to copy, distribute and transmit) and adapt this document, provided you appropriately attribute the authors and the Sydney Policy Reform Project.Faculty/School
Faculty of Arts and Social SciencesDepartment, Discipline or Centre
Sydney Policy Reform ProjectShare