Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLyster, Rosemary
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-09T06:09:42Z
dc.date.available2024-10-09T06:09:42Z
dc.date.issued2002en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/33140
dc.description.abstractThe 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (the Rio Conference) heralded a new era of environmental law, with its purpose to formulate strategies to achieve sustainable development worldwide, recognising the interconnectedness of all systems on earth, and the need to protect them. The conference instruments recognise that the sustainability of the earth depends on national responses that are crafted with the fullest possible extent of public participation. Recent Australian policy for managing natural resources has sought to reflect the goals of sustainable development as enunciated by the Rio Conference and this article looks at two key features of this policy: the establishment of government/community partnerships to achieve ecologically sustainable natural resource management; and the numerous proposals by the Commonwealth and New South Wales governments that market-based instruments be used to address natural resource degradation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherThomson Reutersen
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental and Planning Law Journalen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectRio Conferenceen
dc.subjectsustainable developmenten
dc.subjectpublic participationen
dc.subjectcommunity partnershipsen
dc.subjectmarket-based instrumentsen
dc.title(De)regulating the rural environmenten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
dc.rights.otherThis article was published by Thomson Reuters in the Environmental and Planning Law Journal and should be cited as Lyster, R. (2002). (De)regulating the rural environment. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 19(1), 34–57. For all subscription inquiries please phone, from Australia: 1300 304 195, from Overseas: +61 2 8587 7980 or online at legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/search. The official PDF version of this article can also be purchased separately from Thomson Reuters at http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/subscribe-or-purchase. This publication is copyright. Other than for the purposes of and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of it may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited. PO Box 3502, Rozelle NSW 2039. legal.thomsonreuters.com.auen
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law Schoolen
usyd.citation.volume19en
usyd.citation.issue1en
usyd.citation.spage34en
usyd.citation.epage57en
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.