(De)regulating the rural environment
Field | Value | Language |
dc.contributor.author | Lyster, Rosemary | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-09T06:09:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-09T06:09:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | en_AU |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/33140 | |
dc.description.abstract | The 1992 United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (the Rio Conference) heralded a new era of environmental law, with its purpose to formulate strategies to achieve sustainable development worldwide, recognising the interconnectedness of all systems on earth, and the need to protect them. The conference instruments recognise that the sustainability of the earth depends on national responses that are crafted with the fullest possible extent of public participation. Recent Australian policy for managing natural resources has sought to reflect the goals of sustainable development as enunciated by the Rio Conference and this article looks at two key features of this policy: the establishment of government/community partnerships to achieve ecologically sustainable natural resource management; and the numerous proposals by the Commonwealth and New South Wales governments that market-based instruments be used to address natural resource degradation. | en_AU |
dc.language.iso | en | en_AU |
dc.publisher | Thomson Reuters | en_AU |
dc.relation.ispartof | Environmental and Planning Law Journal | en_AU |
dc.rights | Copyright All Rights Reserved | en_AU |
dc.subject | Rio Conference | en_AU |
dc.subject | sustainable development | en_AU |
dc.subject | public participation | en_AU |
dc.subject | community partnerships | en_AU |
dc.subject | market-based instruments | en_AU |
dc.title | (De)regulating the rural environment | en_AU |
dc.type | Article | en_AU |
dc.type.pubtype | Publisher's version | en_AU |
dc.rights.other | This article was published by Thomson Reuters in the Environmental and Planning Law Journal and should be cited as Lyster, R. (2002). (De)regulating the rural environment. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 19(1), 34–57. For all subscription inquiries please phone, from Australia: 1300 304 195, from Overseas: +61 2 8587 7980 or online at legal.thomsonreuters.com.au/search. The official PDF version of this article can also be purchased separately from Thomson Reuters at http://sites.thomsonreuters.com.au/journals/subscribe-or-purchase. This publication is copyright. Other than for the purposes of and subject to the conditions prescribed under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of it may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited. PO Box 3502, Rozelle NSW 2039. legal.thomsonreuters.com.au | en_AU |
usyd.faculty | SeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law School | en_AU |
usyd.citation.volume | 19 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.issue | 1 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.spage | 34 | en_AU |
usyd.citation.epage | 57 | en_AU |
workflow.metadata.only | No | en_AU |
Associated file/s
Associated collections