Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChando, Shingisai
dc.contributor.authorHowell, Martin
dc.contributor.authorDickson, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorJaure, Allison
dc.contributor.authorCraig, Jonathan C.
dc.contributor.authorEades, Sandra J.
dc.contributor.authorHoward, Kirsten
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-04T00:13:04Z
dc.date.available2024-10-04T00:13:04Z
dc.date.issued2024en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/33137
dc.description.abstractBackground. The factors informing decisions to fund health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are unclear. This study's objective aimed to describe decision-makers’ perspectives on factors informing decisions to fund health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children. Methods. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 participants experienced in making funding decisions at organisational, state, territory and national levels. Decision-makers were from New South Wales, Northern Territory, Queensland, Victoria and Western Australia. Transcripts were analysed thematically following the principles of grounded theory. Results. We identified five themes, each with subthemes. First, prioritising engagement for authentic partnerships (opportunities to build relationships and mutual understanding, co-design and co-evaluation for implementation). Second, valuing participant experiences to secure receptiveness (cultivating culturally safe environments to facilitate acceptability, empowering for self-determination and sustainability, strengthening connectedness and collaboration for holistic care, restoring confidence and generational trust through long-term commitments). Third, comprehensive approaches to promote health and wellbeing (linking impacts to developmental milestones, maintaining access to health care, broadening conceptualisations of child health). Fourth, threats to optimal service delivery (fractured and outdated technology systems amplify data access difficulties, failure to ‘truly listen’ fuelling redundant policy, rigid funding models undermining innovation). Fifth, navigating political and ideological hurdles to advance community priorities (negotiating politicians’ willingness to support community-driven objectives, pressure to satisfy economic and policy considerations, countering entrenched hesitancy to community-controlled governance). Conclusion. Decisionmakers viewed participation, engagement, trust, empowerment and community acceptance as important indicators of service performance. This study highlights factors that influence decisions to fund health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherCSIROen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Journal of Primary Healthen_AU
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0en_AU
dc.subjectAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander childrenen_AU
dc.subjectchild health servicesen_AU
dc.subjectevaluation reportingen_AU
dc.subjecthealth servicesen_AU
dc.subjecthealth services fundingen_AU
dc.subjecthealth services policyen_AU
dc.subjectIndigenous health servicesen_AU
dc.subjectprimary health careen_AU
dc.titleFactors informing funding of health services for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children: perspectives of decision-makersen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.identifier.doi10.1071/PY24054
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
dc.relation.nhmrc1023998, 1035378, 1124822 and 1135271
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Healthen_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.