Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNottage, Luke
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-04T23:37:54Z
dc.date.available2024-09-04T23:37:54Z
dc.date.issued2024en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/33050
dc.description.abstractThis article explores developments in consumer law and practice in Japan as an important area that has not seen much comparative scholarship in Western languages despite significant developments over the last 10-20 years. The article connects developments to broader debates about the nature of contemporary Japanese law and society, as well as the trajectory of consumer law more generally, by mainly comparing Australia although other jurisdictions are also discussed. The comparative analysis first explains the persistent problems around consumer redress. It then focuses on issues and reforms in consumer affairs administration, including the functions of reforming and enforcing consumer laws, the relationship with competition law concepts and regulators, and the relationship between consumer affairs regulators and other government agencies or stakeholders. The article then examines developments in consumer product safety law and contracts, including new challenges from e-commerce and digital technologies, before drawing conclusions reiterating the usefulness of socio-legal comparisons of consumer law.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherLexisNexisen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofCompetition and Consumer Law Journalen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectcomparative scholarshipen_AU
dc.subjectconsumer redressen_AU
dc.subjectconsumer affairs administrationen_AU
dc.subjectconsumer product safety lawen_AU
dc.subjecte-commerceen_AU
dc.titleConsumer law redress and administration, product safety regulation and contracts: Comparing Japan and Australiaen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4803 International and comparative law::480301 Asian and Pacific lawen_AU
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4801 Commercial law::480199 Commercial law not elsewhere classifieden_AU
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
dc.rights.otherThis article was published by LexisNexis and should be cited as: Nottage, L., & Kozuka, S. (2024). Consumer law redress and administration, product safety regulation and contracts: Comparing Japan and Australia. Competition and Consumer Law Journal, 30(3), 269–295.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law Schoolen_AU
usyd.citation.volume30en_AU
usyd.citation.issue3en_AU
usyd.citation.spage269en_AU
usyd.citation.epage295en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.