Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hunter
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-06T05:37:04Z
dc.date.available2024-08-06T05:37:04Z
dc.date.issued2024en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/32898
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractThe management of early upper gastrointestinal neoplasia has transformed significantly with advanced endoscopic resection (ER) techniques. Lesions that once required invasive surgery can now be removed safely and effectively using ER. This thesis investigates the outcomes of innovative ER techniques in two uncommon lesions in a Western society: early gastric cancer (EGC) and large duodenal adenomas (DA). Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in EGCs with negligible risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM) are considered an absolute indication (AI) for endoscopic cure, while those with higher LNM risks, typically requiring surgical resection, are considered a relative indication (RI) for ESD due to patient frailty or preference. In a prospective study of 149 patients undergoing 157 ESDs, no significant difference was found in overall survival and disease-free survival at a median follow-up of 51.6 months between AI-EGC and RI-EGC cohorts. ESD was safe and effective with low rates of serious adverse events, providing survival advantages to patients who are poor surgical candidates, likely sufficient to span their remaining life expectancy. In a cohort study comparing cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) against conventional EMR with thermal margin ablation in 104 large (≥15mm) DAs, CS-EMR had significantly lower rates of intraprocedural and post-procedural bleeding but was compromised by higher rates of residual and recurrent adenoma. This adds significant patient and healthcare surveillance burdens and highlights the limitations of CS-EMR. ER has supplanted surgery as the primary therapeutic strategy for early upper gastrointestinal neoplasia. We demonstrated meaningful survival benefits associated with ESD for RI-EGC in a comorbid Western population, avoiding surgical morbidity. Furthermore, the advantages and limitations of CS-EMR in the duodenum create a framework for ongoing refinements in EMR techniques, prioritising improvements in procedural safety.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectEndoscopic submucosal dissectionen_AU
dc.subjectmucosal resectionen_AU
dc.subjectendoscopyen_AU
dc.titleInnovations in endoscopic resection of the upper gastrointestinal tracten_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisMasters by Researchen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Westmead Clinical Schoolen_AU
usyd.degreeMaster of Philosophy M.Philen_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU
usyd.advisorBOURKE, MICHAEL
usyd.include.pubYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.