Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSymes, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Jason
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-01T01:57:58Z
dc.date.available2024-08-01T01:57:58Z
dc.date.issued2022en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/32873
dc.description.abstractThe creditor defeating disposition (CDD) provisions have now been tested in court with the first decision in May 2022, 'Franklin v Tecnologie Fluenti Pty Ltd'. This article will examine the reasoning in the case and consider its broader implications for legitimate corporate restructuring and the phoenix industry. However, before discussing the case we first provide a summary of the new laws.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.publisherLexisNexisen_AU
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Journal of Corporate Lawen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden_AU
dc.subjectcreditorsen_AU
dc.subjectinsolvencyen_AU
dc.subjectcompany directorsen_AU
dc.subjectliquidationen_AU
dc.subjectbankruptcyen_AU
dc.titleWhen the new model meets the classic: Creditor-defeating dispositionsen_AU
dc.typeArticleen_AU
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::48 LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES::4801 Commercial law::480103 Corporations and associations lawen_AU
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen_AU
dc.rights.otherThis article was published by LexisNexis and should be cited as: Symes, C., & Harris, J. (2022). When the new model meets the classic: Creditor-defeating dispositions. Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 37(3), 289–300.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law Schoolen_AU
usyd.citation.volume37en_AU
usyd.citation.issue3en_AU
usyd.citation.spage289en_AU
usyd.citation.epage300en_AU
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.