Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGlister, Jamie
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-25T23:28:26Z
dc.date.available2024-07-25T23:28:26Z
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/32846
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses the recovery of consequential loss following a breach of trust. The traditional method of enforcing trustee duties - the account - cannot accommodate consequential recovery. However, the position may be changing because cases now short-circuit the accounting process and simply award equitable compensation for breach of trust. The article also discusses consequential recovery for breach of fiduciary duty and various common-law claims, and explains when those claims will lie in the alternative to a claim for breach of trust.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherLexisNexisen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Equityen
dc.rightsCopyright All Rights Reserveden
dc.subjectbreachen
dc.subjecttrusten
dc.subjectconsequential lossen
dc.subjectequitable compensationen
dc.subjectconsequential recoveryen
dc.subjectfiduciary dutyen
dc.titleBreach of trust and consequential lossen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.pubtypePublisher's versionen
dc.rights.otherThis article was published by LexisNexis and should be cited as: Glister, J. (2014). Breach of trust and consequential loss. Journal of Equity, 8(3), 235–258.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law Schoolen
usyd.citation.volume8en
usyd.citation.issue3en
usyd.citation.spage235en
usyd.citation.epage258en
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.