Breach of trust and consequential loss
| Field | Value | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | Glister, Jamie | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-25T23:28:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-25T23:28:26Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2123/32846 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This article discusses the recovery of consequential loss following a breach of trust. The traditional method of enforcing trustee duties - the account - cannot accommodate consequential recovery. However, the position may be changing because cases now short-circuit the accounting process and simply award equitable compensation for breach of trust. The article also discusses consequential recovery for breach of fiduciary duty and various common-law claims, and explains when those claims will lie in the alternative to a claim for breach of trust. | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | LexisNexis | en |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Equity | en |
| dc.rights | Copyright All Rights Reserved | en |
| dc.subject | breach | en |
| dc.subject | trust | en |
| dc.subject | consequential loss | en |
| dc.subject | equitable compensation | en |
| dc.subject | consequential recovery | en |
| dc.subject | fiduciary duty | en |
| dc.title | Breach of trust and consequential loss | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.type.pubtype | Publisher's version | en |
| dc.rights.other | This article was published by LexisNexis and should be cited as: Glister, J. (2014). Breach of trust and consequential loss. Journal of Equity, 8(3), 235–258. | en |
| usyd.faculty | SeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Law School | en |
| usyd.citation.volume | 8 | en |
| usyd.citation.issue | 3 | en |
| usyd.citation.spage | 235 | en |
| usyd.citation.epage | 258 | en |
| workflow.metadata.only | No | en |
Associated file/s
Associated collections