Artificial Intelligence-Driven Mammography-Based Future Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: A Systematic Review
Type
ArticleAuthor/s
Schopf, CodyRamwala, Ojas
Lowry, Kathryn
Hofvind, Solveig
Marinovich, Luke
Houssami, Nehmat
Elmore, Joann
Dontchos, Brian
Lee, Janie
Lee, Christoph
Abstract
The purpose of this review was to summarize the literature regarding the performance of mammography-image based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, with and without additional clinical data, for future breast cancer risk prediction.
Sixteen studies met inclusion and exclusion ...
See moreThe purpose of this review was to summarize the literature regarding the performance of mammography-image based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, with and without additional clinical data, for future breast cancer risk prediction. Sixteen studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria, of which 14 studies provided AUC values. The median AUC performance of AI image-only models was 0.72 (range 0.62-0.90) compared with 0.61 for breast density or clinical risk factor–based tools (range 0.54-0.69). Of the seven studies that compared AI image-only performance directly to combined image + clinical risk factor performance, six demonstrated no significant improvement, and one study demonstrated increased improvement. Early efforts for predicting future breast cancer risk based on mammography images alone demonstrate comparable or better accuracy to traditional risk tools with little or no improvement when adding clinical risk factor data. Transitioning from clinical risk factor–based to AI image-based risk models may lead to more accurate, personalized risk-based screening approaches.
See less
See moreThe purpose of this review was to summarize the literature regarding the performance of mammography-image based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, with and without additional clinical data, for future breast cancer risk prediction. Sixteen studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria, of which 14 studies provided AUC values. The median AUC performance of AI image-only models was 0.72 (range 0.62-0.90) compared with 0.61 for breast density or clinical risk factor–based tools (range 0.54-0.69). Of the seven studies that compared AI image-only performance directly to combined image + clinical risk factor performance, six demonstrated no significant improvement, and one study demonstrated increased improvement. Early efforts for predicting future breast cancer risk based on mammography images alone demonstrate comparable or better accuracy to traditional risk tools with little or no improvement when adding clinical risk factor data. Transitioning from clinical risk factor–based to AI image-based risk models may lead to more accurate, personalized risk-based screening approaches.
See less
Date
2024Source title
Journal of the American College of RadiologyVolume
21Issue
2Publisher
ElsevierLicence
Copyright All Rights ReservedFaculty/School
The University of Sydney School of Public HealthShare