Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPenzo, Emma Fatma
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-27T23:33:22Z
dc.date.available2024-05-27T23:33:22Z
dc.date.issued2024en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/32583
dc.description.abstractThis thesis presents a new institutional perspective to International Business (IB) studies (and to business and management studies in general) by drawing extensively upon the theory of discursive institutionalism, which originated from the field of political science. It stakes the claim that discourse is necessary to processes of institutional change and formation. If we accept that humans are the authors of institutions, it follows that such authorship is the function of discourse. Discourse is how humans agree to establish, change, and dissolve institutions. Further, if the relationship between discourse and institutions is one of mutual dependence, then the nature of the discourse is critical to understand the structure and evolution of the focal institution. The implication is that the underlying assumptions (values) of the discourse bear significantly upon the institution itself. It then follows that values underpin institutions. This institutional perspective is underpinned by an empirical case study focusing on how the Australian banking institution of remuneration disclosures (Basel III Pillar 3) came into being. Through the theoretical lens of discursive institutionalism, by tracing the discourse, the fining is that this institution originated from the expression of the moral imperative to hold banks and bankers to account. I propose the Discursive Process for Institutional Formation (DPIF) model as an important extension to the theory of Discursive Institutionalism. The DPIF traces the values-laden germination of a policy shift through four stages to firm-level adoption. Though values were the undergirding premise for the institution, the discourse evolved as institutionalization progressed, with the expression of values giving way to increasingly bureaucratic technical language. Three levels of governance were traversed (global, national, and corporate), across two cycles of the DPIF, to institutionalize the initial policy fix.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectInstitutionalen
dc.subjectdiscourseen
dc.subjectgovernanceen
dc.subjectbankingen
dc.subjectDPIFen
dc.subjectinternational business.en
dc.titleBanking on values: A discursive analysis of values and global banking business practiceen
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::The University of Sydney Business School::Discipline of International Businessen
usyd.departmentInternational Businessen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorWelch, Catherine


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.