Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMelman, Alla
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-30T01:39:31Z
dc.date.available2024-04-30T01:39:31Z
dc.date.issued2024en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/32501
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractChapter 1 summarises the prevalence and burden of low back pain in Australia, with a focus on hospital admissions, and introduces virtual hospital care as an opportunity to reduce inpatient hospitalisation. Chapter 2 systematically reviews global rates of hospital admission and stays for LBP. Chapter 3 describes usual care for people admitted to hospital with LBP. The study found that opioids were administered in approximately 80% of admissions and 49% of patients with radicular low back pain were given an antiepileptic medication in addition to an opioid. Chapter 4 estimated what proportion of patients initially diagnosed with non-serious LBP in the ED were discharged following an inpatient admission with a similar diagnosis, and therefore potentially suitable for virtual hospital care as an alternative to traditional admission. The proportion of potentially avoidable admissions for non-serious LBP were found to be ~57%, with ~14% deemed a serious spinal pathology and ~24% other non-lumbar pathology, both likely requiring admission. Chapter 5 identified potential barriers to and facilitators of the world’s first ‘Back@Home’ virtual hospital model of care. The resulting model was co-designed with front line clinicians to mitigate concerns while optimising virtual care delivery. Chapter 6 presents the protocol for evaluating Back@Home, a hybrid effectiveness-implementation type-I feasibility study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a virtual hospital model of care for LBP on health service outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, costs, acceptability, and appropriateness of the virtual hospital model of care, as well as the feasibility and fidelity of our multifaceted implementation strategy. Chapter 7 presents the preliminary evaluation of Back@Home, a mixed-methods study using the RE-AIM framework. Chapter 8 summarises the principal findings of this thesis, describes its clinical implications and suggests future programs of research related to Back@Home.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectlow back painen_AU
dc.subjecthealth servicesen_AU
dc.subjectvirtual hospitalen_AU
dc.titleInvestigating hospital admissions for low back pain for low back painen_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::The University of Sydney School of Public Healthen_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU
usyd.advisorDE CARVALHO MACHADO, GUSTAVO
usyd.include.pubYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.