Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAndersen, Christopher Ross
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-12T02:39:48Z
dc.date.available2024-02-12T02:39:48Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/32202
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractAneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) is a catastrophic type of stroke with high mortality and morbidity. In contrast to the dramatic improvements in ischaemic stroke care, there has been no major changes in aSAH management over the past 20 years. One issue that may be limiting progress is the use of inconsistent, inappropriate, or insensitive outcome measures. Our systematic review of aSAH research identified 129 trials that used 51 unique primary outcomes. The most common measures used were functional scales for neurological conditions that have different pathophysiology, epidemiology and long-term sequelae compared to aSAH. Measures of cognition and health related quality of life (HRQOL) were reported rarely. At a multistakeholder workshop we built consensus around improving outcome selection in aSAH by developing a core outcome set (COS). A COS is a limited set of outcome measures that are recommended to be reported in all aSAH studies. It will ensure that we are selecting the right aspects of health (domains) at the right timepoints using the best available measurement instruments. To inform domain selection we conducted two international surveys. A q-method survey revealed distinct viewpoints among stakeholders. HRQOL was the highest ranked domain followed by independence and function. In a Delphi survey the highest ranked domains were cognition and function, with domains such as aneurysm obliteration, rebleeding, HRQOL and mood also in the top 10. These results confirm a mismatch between outcomes used by researchers and those prioritised by stakeholders. The results of the surveys were then presented to a second multistakeholder consensus workshop that generated a list of 4 core outcome domains: mortality, function, cognition and HRQOL. Further work is required to determine the ideal timepoints and best measurement instruments. This thesis improves outcome selection in aSAH research by addressing the current mismatch and provides the basis for a COS.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectSubarachnoid Haemorrhageen
dc.subjectCore Outcome Setsen
dc.subjectPatient Reported Outcome Measuresen
dc.subjectClinical Outcomesen
dc.subjectCritical Careen
dc.titleCore Outcomes in Critical Care: Development of a Core Outcome Set in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage Clinical Researchen
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::The University of Sydney School of Public Healthen
usyd.departmentGeorge Institute for Global Healthen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorDELANEY, ANTHONY
usyd.include.pubYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.