Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcDermott, Joshua
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T02:02:20Z
dc.date.available2023-12-11T02:02:20Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/31967
dc.description.abstractHellenistic geographical treatises have traditionally received little attention for their ideological content. Recent scholarship has provided much needed revision to this approach, examining these texts through an imperial lens. However, such readings tend to overlook elements which stifle, rather than promote, imperial concerns. This thesis argues that these diverse geographies can be understood as sympotic gifts of court Philoi (friends) to the king. Imperial propaganda is interpreted as epainos (praise), and potentially subversive texts are understood as parrhēsia (frank speech). To identify these elements in court geography, a range of tools are adopted. Spatial geographic elements are viewed through critical and counter-cartographic lenses to identify epainos and parrhēsia. In descriptive geography, digressions, emplotment, and implicit juxtaposition are considered as means of reinforcing or, conversely, distancing us from the imperial gaze. Two case studies explore the imperial geography of early Hellenistic kingdoms. First, the geographical propaganda of the Ptolemies is examined and found to prescribe a universalising thalassocracy. However, Eratosthenes of Kyrene’s geography will be shown to perform as parrhēsia, effectively disrupting these imperial pretensions. The second case study considers early Seleukid geography in which claims of universal kinship are identified in the treatises of Patrokles and others. In contrast, Megasthenes’ geography will be shown express parrhēsia and challenge these claims. This dissertation redefines our understanding of Hellenistic geography by adopting a sympotic cultural lens. The identification of elements of parrhēsia within court geography allows for a more nuanced reading of Hellenistic geographies as texts responding to the concerns of the sympotic court. Court geographies performed vital ideological functions: geographic tools provided unique ways for Philoi to challenge the imperial claims of their royal patrons.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectHellenisticen
dc.subjectGeographyen
dc.subjectParrhesiaen
dc.subjectPropagandaen
dc.subjectPhiloien
dc.subjectCourten
dc.titleBending Space: Praise and Parrhēsia in Hellenistic Court Geographyen
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences::School of Humanitiesen
usyd.departmentDepartment of Classics and Ancient Historyen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorKindt, Julia
usyd.include.pubNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.