Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChowdhury, Anonnya Rizwana
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-01T04:33:03Z
dc.date.available2023-12-01T04:33:03Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/31931
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractThe burden of disabling chronic pain conditions in the working age population, is compounded by a combination of higher costs of health care services and lost work income. The recognition of these multiple burdens, for both the individuals concerned, their immediate families, as well as for employers and the general community, has led to calls for more cost-effective pain management for adults with chronic pain. Interdisciplinary chronic pain management interventions have been found to be effective in reducing disability due to chronic pain in working age adults, but little is known about the cost-effectiveness of such interventions. Economic evaluation requires that assessment measures should be standardised, time efficient and aimed to collect information on chronic pain patients’ health, productivity gain, quality of life and health care utilization costs to inform decision makers and payers to aid their funding decisions. The first two studies in this thesis included a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of chronic pain management programs to identify what proportion of interdisciplinary pain management programs are cost-effective and the productivity outcome of such interventions. The third study involved an economic analysis of an interdisciplinary self-management program for chronic pain patients called ADAPT (Active Day Patient Treatment) in Sydney using patient reported hospital administrative data comparing patients’ pre-treatment and 1 month follow-up labour force participation, health and health care services utilization outcomes. The fourth study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ADAPT comparing patients’ pre-treatment and >12 months follow-up data including patients’ labour force participation, quality of life and health care services utilization information. The overall findings suggest patients had improved labour force participation, better health and quality of life; and reduced healthcare utilization costs after participating in ADAPT.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectChronic painen
dc.subjectInterdisciplinaryen
dc.subjectPain self-managementen
dc.subjectEconomic analysisen
dc.subjectCost effectiveen
dc.subjectLabour force participationen
dc.titleEconomic Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Pain Self-Management Programen
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::Northern Clinical Schoolen
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen
usyd.advisorNICHOLAS, MICHAEL
usyd.include.pubYesen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.