Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGallagher, Benjamin
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-06T04:30:09Z
dc.date.available2023-07-06T04:30:09Z
dc.date.issued2023en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/31440
dc.descriptionIncludes publication
dc.description.abstractThere is a lack of contemporary research that describes the relationship between SES, disease severity, primary treatment, and survival in Australian men with prostate cancer. The aim of this thesis was to more comprehensively characterise the relationships of SES with treatment, treatment outcomes and survival among men with prostate cancer in a contemporary context. Prostate cancer treatment varies in adherence complexity, costs, and geographic accessibility. These distinctions may result in SES differences. Chapter 2 used systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify and describe SES variation in prostate cancer treatment in the literature. Treatment in a higher volume hospital is associated with better outcomes. Previous research shows lower SES groups have poor access to these hospitals. Chapter 3 investigated SES differences in unplanned readmissions following radical prostatectomy, and whether differences depended on hospital volume. Disease severity mediates the relationship between SES and prostate cancer survival. However, in Australia there is limited availability of disease severity variables. Chapter 4 demonstrated the feasibility of obtaining pathology data from cancer notifications held by a state-based registry. This data was used in chapter 5. Studies of SES and survival among Australian prostate cancer cases do not include sufficient mediators. Consequently, inequalities are not explained. Chapter 5 investigated the relationship between SES and survival among men with incident prostate cancer from The 45 and up Study, whilst including novel mediators. The 45 and Up Study likely suffers non-respondent bias. Chapter 6 investigated SES differences in survival after adjusting for confounders and mediators in a NSW population data set, during the period of 2004-2019. The findings from this thesis may justify further research and development of public health initiatives that could more equitably improve the lives of men with prostate cancer.en_AU
dc.language.isoenen_AU
dc.subjectProstateen_AU
dc.subjectcanceren_AU
dc.subjectepidemiologyen_AU
dc.subjectsocioeconomic statusen_AU
dc.subjectsocial determinants of healthen_AU
dc.titleSocioeconomic differences in treatment, outcomes of treatment and survival in prostate canceren_AU
dc.typeThesis
dc.type.thesisDoctor of Philosophyen_AU
dc.rights.otherThe author retains copyright of this thesis. It may only be used for the purposes of research and study. It must not be used for any other purposes and may not be transmitted or shared with others without prior permission.en_AU
usyd.facultySeS faculties schools::Faculty of Medicine and Health::The University of Sydney School of Public Healthen_AU
usyd.degreeDoctor of Philosophy Ph.D.en_AU
usyd.awardinginstThe University of Sydneyen_AU
usyd.advisorSmith, Associate Professor David
usyd.include.pubYesen_AU


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.