Submission to the Inquiry into the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice Referendum
Access status:
Open Access
Type
OtherAbstract
Enshrinement of the Voice in the Constitution is necessary for several reasons. The proposed preambular statement to s 129 would rectify a constitutional silence. The recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples continues the trajectory of the development of the ...
See moreEnshrinement of the Voice in the Constitution is necessary for several reasons. The proposed preambular statement to s 129 would rectify a constitutional silence. The recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples continues the trajectory of the development of the constitutional identity of ‘the people’ in the Constitution. The structure of the Voice proposal is consistent with Australian constitutional design. The ability of the Voice to make representations to the Executive is consistent with existing institutional relationships and the legal effect of such representations can be determined by the Parliament.
See less
See moreEnshrinement of the Voice in the Constitution is necessary for several reasons. The proposed preambular statement to s 129 would rectify a constitutional silence. The recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples continues the trajectory of the development of the constitutional identity of ‘the people’ in the Constitution. The structure of the Voice proposal is consistent with Australian constitutional design. The ability of the Voice to make representations to the Executive is consistent with existing institutional relationships and the legal effect of such representations can be determined by the Parliament.
See less
Date
2023-06-15Source title
Inquiry into the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice ReferendumPublisher
The University of SydneyLicence
OtherFaculty/School
The University of Sydney Law SchoolShare