Show simple item record

FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFlew, Terry
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-29T05:47:46Z
dc.date.available2023-05-29T05:47:46Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2123/31273
dc.description.abstractThe liberal art of government is forced to determine the precise extent to which and up to what point individual interest, that is to say, individual interests insofar as they are different and possibly opposed to one another, constitute a danger for the interest of all. The problem of security is the protection of the collective interest against individual interests. Conversely, individual interests have to be protected against everything that could be seen as an encroachment of the collective interest.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCentre for the Study of Governance & Society, Public Lecture Series, Kings College Londonen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0en
dc.subjectgovernanceen
dc.subjectcensorshipen
dc.subjectFacebooken
dc.subjectOversight Boarden
dc.subjectFoucaulten
dc.subjectdigital rightsen
dc.title‘Too much’ and ‘too little’ content moderation: Internet governance as a case study in advanced liberal modes of governmenten
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::47 LANGUAGE, COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE::4701 Communication and media studiesen
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::47 LANGUAGE, COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE::4702 Cultural studies::470201 Arts and cultural policyen
dc.subject.asrcANZSRC FoR code::44 HUMAN SOCIETY::4407 Policy and administration::440701 Communications and media policyen
usyd.facultyFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, School of Art, Communication and Englishen
usyd.departmentMedia and Communicationen
workflow.metadata.onlyNoen


Show simple item record

Associated file/s

Associated collections

Show simple item record

There are no previous versions of the item available.